My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
RDA Min 1997-04-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Redevelopment
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
RDA Min 1997-04-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:37:59 PM
Creation date
3/29/2004 11:19:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Study
Agency Type
Redevelopment
Date
4/14/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> " " <br /> Mr. Irmer said that he couldn't find fault with building rentals on that site. He said <br /> the housing market was "abloom once again after a dormancy of very many years." <br />'- Mr. Irmer said there was a real need for entry level housing in Redwood City, <br /> especially for young people. He said if the City did not build to meet their needs, the <br /> City just "might lose our young people." He said the growth of entry level <br /> employment dictate the need for apartment living. Mr. Irmer said it was critical to <br /> include the elements that "make up a sense of community" and be "attractive enough <br /> to encourage redevelopment and the sustainment of this continuum we are trying to <br /> bring forth in our community." <br /> In response to Board Director's questions, Mr. Irmer said homeowner association <br /> lawsuits have dampened the enthusiasm of condominium developers, and it is a <br /> problem. He said he did not build condominiums anymore for that reason. Mr. Irmer <br /> said he believed the ceiling on "for sale" units was $230,000 to $250,000 maximum, <br /> regardless of size, numbers of bathrooms, fixtures, etc. Simply based on its location. <br /> "There are other inventories in the marketplace that perhaps would be a better 'for <br /> sale' investment." He said he would not summarily dismiss the idea of full rent <br /> housing. <br /> In response to Board Director's questions regarding appropriate density for the <br /> Lonestar site, Mr. Irmer said he hadn't seen the site nor site plan, hadn't worked with <br /> any of the numbers, and hadn't done the analysis necessary to have that answer, but his <br /> gut reaction might be that the proposed density might be a little high. He said he was <br />- speaking as a private citizen with no interest in the property, and was invited to <br /> address the Agency Board by Director Church to offer his knowledge as a <br /> builder/developer. <br /> In response to Board Director's questions, Mr. Irmer, said it appears that the <br /> mortgage on "for sale" units priced around $200,000 to $225,000 would be close to the <br /> projected rents of $1,600 to $1,800 per month at the Lonestar site. He said the interest <br /> deduction was one of the last tax write-offs remaining for the American people. <br /> Mr. Irmer said, "I would not like to see a mix of rental and 'for sale' on that tight a <br /> site (Lonestar site only.) If we were talking about a larger site of 30,40, 50 acres and <br /> it was a planned unit development with areas of activity - a rental community has a <br /> different feel than an ownership community. It is not that apparent, but there is a <br /> difference about it. There is a little more activity of move-ins and move-outs, and by <br /> its very nature it's going to be a little more active. I would not like to see this project <br /> in that frame-work. <br /> "As far as the mixed use of retail and residential, be it rental or 'for sale', I think that <br /> El Camino has to be treated very carefully. I am concerned about any retail up there <br /> divorced ITom the major body of retail interests which is our downtown and Sequoia <br />- <br /> SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO.1 APRIL 14, 1997 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 409 PAGE 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.