Laserfiche WebLink
<br />find one vacant property in Area 2. Mr. Hannig described a recent profitable sale of a <br />property in the proposed area and said, "this tells us that you have escalating property <br />values, when a current sale exceeds an option price, thus defeating one of the <br />characteristics that are frequently associated with blight." He described a San Carlos <br />business moving into that property which also denies blight. Mr. Hannig said crime <br />was not a problem in the area, although there was a lot of criminal activity at one <br />location, 1301 Maple Street - the Redwood City Police Department. Mr. Hannig said <br />his data shows the proposed Area is not blighted nor were there so-called irregular lots. <br />Mr. Hannig said this was a serious issue, and the businesses he represented had a <br />passion for Redwood City and much preferred to work with the City. <br />Mr. Hannig addressed the issue of the City's ethical obligations to businesses that <br />have been located in the City for decades and have large investments. He said Lyngso <br />was a prime example of the type of company which had provided much needed <br />materials which actually help to alleviate blight in the City. He said that the Plan, and <br />newspaper articles on the Plan, suggests that the Redevelopment Agency intended to <br />relocate auto dealerships into the proposed Area. He said such an incompatible use <br />downwind from Lyngso, Granite Rock, Peninsula Building Materials and others <br />threatens the vitality of the whole area. He said, "As a lawyer, I know that litigation <br />will ensue. In the long run the citizens of Redwood City will be the losers. These <br />businesses should not have to worry. Family members should not have to lie awake <br />wondering what a Redevelopment District is going to do as it changes over the <br />political course of its lengthy history. Mr. Hannig said, "I believe the City's ethical <br />obligations to business like these are to give them certainty as to their future as they <br />have provided the City with its own stable future." <br />Mr. Hannig described the other properties in the area, all without vacancies. He said <br />prices will increase if construction materials companies are forced to move out of the <br />area. He said he represented the property owners of Jay's Towing site, and said they <br />were quite willing to talk about development. Mr. Hannig said free enterprise is at <br />work. <br />Mr. Hannig said his data and photos clearly show that Area 2 is not blighted. He said, <br />"A wise man once told me that a good City Council has a desire to act, knows that it <br />should, and does. A great City Council sometimes has a desire to act, but knows that it <br />should not, and does not. Be that great city Council. Do not include Area 2 in the <br />Redevelopment Plan. It is wrong." <br />Mayor/Chairperson Howard announced that the Council/Board was about to close <br />the joint public hearing, and said no further comments would be accepted after that <br />time. She advised that there would be no public comment at the June 22, 1998 <br />Concurrent Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting. Mayor/Chairperson Howard <br />asked if anyone else wished to speak. No one asked to speak. <br />AGENDA FOR THE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING MINUTE BOOK NO.1 JUNE 8,1998 <br />AND CONCURRENT MEETING WITH THE Page No. 489 PAGE 14 <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />