Laserfiche WebLink
11/18/2013 <br /> streamlining only applies to projects that truly benefit the environment and meet both SB <br /> 375 and 226 goals. Eligible projects would thus inciude 1) projects located in TAZs with <br /> 75%or lawer regionaf per capita VMT or 2) projects located in a yellow zane (75-100%of <br /> per capita regional VMT) that can reduce their VMT to 75%of regional average VMT <br /> through project design ele.ments. Projects located in red zanes should not be eligible for <br /> � streamlining.This means eliminating achievement of CALGreen alane as a raute to <br /> eligibility. <br /> 3. Rerfarmance Standards Should ConsiderAffardable Hausing Needs Arnong Residential <br /> Infill Prajects. <br /> The praposed perfarmance standards da not cansider eftects an underserved communities. SB 226 <br /> makes clear that the CEQA Guidelines to be adopted by the Natural Resaurces Agency "shall <br /> promote"the implementation of the land use and transportation palicies of Senate Bill 375 ("SB 375"}, <br /> or the Sustainable Cammunities and Glimate Protection Act of 2008. Cal. Pub. Resources Cade § <br /> 21094.5.5(b)(1}. SB 375 contains many provisions local gavernments must abide by with respect to <br /> affardable housing: <br /> � Hausing element law must make "adequate provision for the hausing needs of all econamic <br /> segments of the community:' CaI. Govt. Code 65583(c). <br /> � Hausing elsment law must"assist in the develapment af adequate housing to meet the <br /> needs af extremely low, very low, low-, and moderate-income hausaholds." Id. § <br /> 65583(c)(1}(G)(2}. <br /> • Housing element law must"[c]onserve and improve the condition of the existing affordable <br /> housing stock,which may include addressing ways to mitigate the lass of dwelling units <br /> demolished by public ar private actian" !d. § G5583(c)(1)(C}(4). <br /> � Transit Priority Prajects cannot "resuft in any net loss in the number af affordable hausing <br /> units within the project area." Cal. Pub. Res. Cade § 21155.1(b)(3). <br /> � Transit Prinrity Projects must ensure that minimum percentages of housing be sold or <br /> rented ta very low, low-, and moderate-income families and that develapers pravide legal <br /> commitments to ensure contlnued availability of affordable housing units, or payment of in- <br /> lieu fees far development af affordable housing. Id. § 21155.1(c). <br /> The Praposed CEQA Guidelines'faur performanae standards applicable to all projects (i.e., <br /> renewable energy, active transit,transit station area plans, and sail and water remediation)and <br /> additianal VMT performance standard for residential prnjects.fail ta account for the statewide policy <br /> objective to maintain and develop affordable housing. While we understand OPR's objective is ta <br /> employ the fewest standards necessary ta pramate a number of environmental objectives, simplicity <br /> �annot come at the risk of displacing low-incame communities or precluding low-incame communities <br /> from the recognized benefits of infill develapment. Accordingly, we propose that affardable housing <br /> pravisions be included in the perfarmance standards. <br /> Recommendation: For all projects— Residential, Cammercial, Office Buildings, or a Small <br /> Community Walkable Project—it should be made clear that no project can result in a net lass <br /> of affordable housing units within a praject area. <br /> For Residential projects in particular, additional performance standards related ta minimum <br /> provisions of affordable housing for rent or purchase, and sufficient legal commitments to <br /> ensure the cantinued availability of hausing far all income levels,should be an added <br /> qualification for CEQA streamlining. <br /> Specifically,we recommend a requirement that no less than 15%af the units be affordable for <br /> lower income households, fi%affordable to vary law-incame and 9%affardable to low-incume. <br /> 3 RESO.#15305 <br /> MUFF#603 <br />