My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15305
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
Res13 15305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2013 4:30:58 PM
Creation date
11/21/2013 4:28:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/18/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. <br /> 11/18/2013 CAPCOA <br /> • • • <br /> MP#LU-1.7&LU-2.1.1.4 PDT-1 Parking Policy/ Pricing <br /> Example: <br /> If the ITE parking generation rate for the project is 100 spaces, for a low range a 5% <br /> reduction in spaces is assumed. For a high range a 25% reduction in spaces is <br /> assumed. <br /> • Low range % VMT Reduction = [(100 - 95)/100] * 0.5 = 2.5°/a <br /> • High range % VMT Reduction = [(100 - 75)/100] * 0.5 = 12.5% <br /> Preferred Literature: <br /> To develop this model, Nelson\Nygaard [1] used the Institute of Transportation <br /> Engineers' Parking Generation handbook as the baseline figure for parking supply. This <br /> is assumed to be unconstrained demand. Trip reduction should only be credited if <br /> measures are implemented to control for spillover parking in and around the project, <br /> such as residential parking permits, metered parking, or time-limited parking. <br /> Alternative Literature: <br /> • 100% increase in transit ridership <br /> • 100°/a increase in transit mode share <br /> According to TCRP Report 95, Chapter 18 [2], the central business district of Portland, <br /> Oregon implemented a maximum parking ratio of 1 space per 1,000 square feet of new <br /> buildings and implemented surface lot restrictions which limited conditions where <br /> buildings could be razed for parking.A "before and after" study was not conducted <br /> specifically for the maximum parking requirements and data comes from various <br /> surveys and published reports. Based on rough estimates the approximate parking ratio <br /> of 3.4 per 1,000 square feet in 1973 (for entire downtown) had been reduce to 1.5 by <br /> 1990. Transit mode share increased from 20% to 40%. The increases in transit ridership <br /> and mode share are not solely from maximum parking requirements. Other companion <br /> strategies, such as market parking pricing and high fuel costs, were in place. <br /> Alternative Literature Sources: <br /> [1] TCRP Report 95, Chapter 18: Parking Management and Supply: Traveler Response <br /> to Transportation System Changes. (p. 18-6) <br /> http://onlinepubs.trb.org/online u� /p tcr��-��95c18.Rdf <br /> Other Literature Reviewed: <br /> None <br /> 209 PDT-1 <br /> 3 RESO.#15305 <br /> MUFF#603 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.