My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-12-09 Special
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-12-09 Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2013 5:11:54 PM
Creation date
12/5/2013 5:05:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
12/9/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4.5.B. - Page 1 <br /> RE PO RT <br /> To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From the Cit Mana er <br /> December 9, 2013 <br /> SUBJECT <br /> Rejection of Claim from Silvia Guersenzvaig on behalf of Joshua Claypole <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> By motion, reject subject claim. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> According to resolution no. 15081, if any amount claimed in connection with a general <br /> liability claim exceeds $50,000, any denial, allowance, allowance in part, settlement, or <br /> compromise must be approved by Council. The amount claimed by the claimant <br /> exceeds that limit and therefore its denial must be approved by the City Council. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> The claimant has placed a claim against the City on behalf of her son who is deceased. <br /> The claimant is alleging that Redwood City is culpable for releasing her son from jail <br /> without evaluating him for mental competence and to ensure he was not a danger to <br /> himself. The claimant's son was arrested by the California Highway Patrol and kept in <br /> the San Mateo County Jail; Redwood City was not involved in the arrest, detention, or <br /> release of the claimant's son therefore we are asking the Council to reject this claim. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> If this claim is not rejected, the statute of limitations for the claimant to file a court action <br /> on the claim is extended from six months to two years, thereby placing the City in a <br /> more difficult position in defending this matter. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> The rejection of this claim has no direct fiscal impact. However, should the claimant <br /> elect to initiate litigation regarding this incident, we have no basis with which to estimate <br /> the legal expenses or a settlement, should such estimates ultimately be required. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> This activity is not a project under CEQA as defined in CEQA Guidelines, section <br /> 15378, because it has no potential for resulting in either a direct or foreseeable physical <br /> change in the environment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.