RecDoc 2013-166544 Conf - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

height of proposed buildings; general location of buildings and vehicular and pedestrian circulation routes; provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes and the location of public improvements; the general location of public utilities; and other terms and conditions of development applicable to the Project, all shall be as set forth in the Existing Approvals and any mutually agreed upon amendments thereto. 2.1.1 �ecific Development Standards. Minimum/maximum lot size, mu�imum gross lot coverage, maximum floor area, setbacks and other development standards shall be as specified in the Precise Plan. 2.1.2 Planned Community Permits. Pursuant to the terms of the Precise Plan and the Rezoning, Developer must obtain Planned Community Permits (each, a "PC Permit") before the development of new buildings or structures may proceed. 2.1.2.1 As provided in the Precise Plan and Rezoning, during the Initial Term and, if applicable the First Term Extension, the required findings for issuance of PC Permits with respect to the Property shall be limited to a finding of consistency with the Precise Plan. A finding of consistency with the Precise Plan shall be based upon City's application of the Precise Plan, including the urban design guidelines, to the proposed site plans and building and improvement designs. 2.1.2.2 If a Second Term Extension is granted, the findings required for approval of a PC Permit with respect to the Property shall be broadened to include (a) a determination whether substantial evidence shows that the triggering conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines section 15162 have occurred, such that the Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR or that significant effects previously examined in the EIR, such as those caused by changes in neighborhood traffic patterns, will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (b) a determination, based upon any required supplemental or additional CEQA review, whether one or more feasible mitigation measures would substantially lessen the new or substantially more severe Project impact or impacts; (c) adoption of such feasible mitigation measure or measures; and (d) if the City finds that the new or substantially more severe Project impact or impacts cannot feasibly be reduced to a less than significant level, the City may elect to deny the PC permit or the City may elect to approve the PC permit based on a statement of overriding considerations, as allowed by CEQA. 2.1.3 Subdivision Maps. Nothing in this Section 2.1 shall be deemed to prevent the City from ensuring compliance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, including its ability to regulate the design of the subdivision and the street work and utilities to be installed by the subdivider on the land to be used for public or private streets, highways, ways and easements. Subdivision improvement requirements for the Project shall be applied in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Municipal Code and this Agreement. 2.1.4 Conflicts. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and any aspect, term ar condition of Applicable City Regulations or the Project Approvals, this Agreement shall control. 12 ATTY/AGR/2013.134/STANFORD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REV: 08-14-13 PT