Laserfiche WebLink
related implementation provisions for specifically defined sediments in most bays and <br /> estuaries. <br /> 2. National Toxics Rule (NTR) and California Toxics Rule(CTR). USEPA adopted the <br /> NTR on December 22, 1992, and amended it on May 4, 1995, and November 9, 1999. About <br /> 40 criteria in the NTR and apply in California. On May 18, 2000,USEPA adopted the CTR. <br /> The CTR promulgated new toxics criteria for California and, in addition, incorporated the <br /> previously adopted NTR criteria that applied in the State. The CTR was amended on <br /> February 13, 2001. These rules contain water quality criteria(WQC) for priarity toxic <br /> pollutants. <br /> 3. State Implementation Policy. On March 2,2000, the State Water Board adopted the Policy <br /> for Implementation of Toxics Standards for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and <br /> Estuaries of California (State Implementation Policy or SIP). The SIP became effective on <br /> Apri128, 2000, with respect to the priority pollutant criteria promulgated through the NTR <br /> and to the WQOs established in the Basin Plan. The SIP became effective on May 18, 2000, <br /> with respect to the priority pollutant criteria promulgated through the CTR. The State Water <br /> Board adopted amendments to the SIP on February 24, 2005,which became effective on <br /> July 13, 2005. The SIP establishes implementation provisions for priority pollutant criteria <br /> and objectives and provisions for chronic toxicity control. Requirements of this Order <br /> implement the SIP. <br /> 4. Alaska Rule. On March 30, 2000, USEPA revised its regulation that specifies when new and <br /> revised state and tribal water quality standards (WQS)become effective for CWA purposes <br /> [65 Fed. Reg. 24641 (Apri127, 2000), codified at 40 CFR 131.21]. Under the revised <br /> regulation(also known as the Alaska Rule), new and revised standards submitted to USEPA <br /> after May 30, 2000,must be approved by USEPA before being used for CWA purposes. The <br /> final rule also provides that standards akeady in effect and submitted to USEPA by May 30, <br /> 2000,may be used for CWA purposes,whether or not approved by USEPA. <br /> 5. Antidegradation Policy.40 CFR 131.12 requires that state WQS include an antidegradation <br /> policy consistent with the federal policy. The State Water Board established California's <br /> antidegradation policy in State Water Board Resolution 68-16,which incorporates the federal <br /> antidegradation policy where the federal policy applies under federal law and requires that <br /> existing quality of waters be maintained unless degradation is justified based on specific <br /> findings. The Regional Water Board's Basin Plan implements, and incorporates by reference, <br /> both the State and federal antidegradation policies. <br /> 6. Anti-Backsliding Requirements. CWA Sections 402(0)(2) and 303(d)(4) and 40 CFR <br /> 122.44(1)prohibit backsliding in NPDES permits. These anti-backsliding provisions require <br /> that effluent limitations in a reissued pernut must be as stringent as those in the previous <br /> permit, with some exceptions in which limitations may be relaxed. This Order retains <br /> effluent limitations no less stringent than those established by previous orders. <br /> Attachment F—Fact Sheet F-10 <br /> For VOC and Fuel General NPDES Permit No.CAG912002 <br />