Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . . <br />- Council Member Ira referred to the line of credit requested in the Redevelopment <br /> Agency Budget, and said, "I am assuming the line of credit is essentially for Fund 807, <br /> the General Fund," and Director Church agreed. He said he was concerned about the <br /> repayment based on projected growth in that Fund. Council Member Ira said, "I guess <br /> my thought is, I really don't believe we are going to get our interest paid back." He <br /> said he believed "the loan was important, the development of that site was important, <br /> but at the same time, we need to be realistic here. I think we have to visualize right <br /> now that that money is going to be taken out of the General Fund and we are not going <br /> to get those interest payments in reality. We really need to look at that and budget <br /> accordingly." <br /> In response to Council Member Ira's questions regarding the low and moderate <br /> income housing fund deficits, Director Church said State law included incentives to <br /> spend those funds, and actually penalized Agencies that accumulate more than two <br /> years annual accrual of revenues. Council Member Ira said it appeared that in year <br /> three there would have to be a cut in housing programs to avoid a deficit situation and <br /> avoid having other funds expended to support those programs, and he wanted everyone <br /> to be aware of that situation. <br /> MEMO 7/7/98 <br />- In response to Council Member Leipzig's questions regarding the legality of <br /> assuming interest payments may not be paid, City Attorney Schricker said, "It is <br /> legal to make a loan. The notion of entering into a loan with the assumption that <br /> interest won't be repaid is not so much a legal question, as a policy as to whether or <br /> not that's the nature of the conditions of the loan you want to make. The loans we <br /> have restructured in the past have had a definite schedule of payments which included <br /> interest and I understood that was what the proposal was this time as well. If that is <br /> not feasible then it ought to be revisited so that we don't project an unrealistic <br /> repayment schedule." Answering further questions, City Attorney Schricker advised <br /> that it was acceptable for a City to make a loan without interest payments. <br /> City Manager Everett advised that one of the conditions involved "is buying a piece <br /> of land. It is our assumption that we won't be giving that piece of land away to a <br /> developer, that we will actually be selling it. And in two years, or a period of time, we <br /> will recapture that or a piece of it, if the Redevelopment Agency does decide to make a <br /> contribution, and by then the land will have gone up as well." He said that a major part <br /> of the repayment of the loan would be covered by development of that property. <br /> Director Church advised that since the Council Membersl Agency Board Members <br /> were both the lender and the borrower, ultimate control of the transaction rested with <br /> them. <br />- <br /> BUDGET STUDY SESSION MINUTE BOOK NO. 57 JULY6,1998 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 051 PAGE 8 <br />