Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 7.1.A. - Page 10 <br /> Attachment B <br /> page 3 of 3 <br /> TDA Article 3 Project Application Form <br /> Fiscal Year of this Claim: 2013/2014 Applicant: City of Redwood City <br /> Contact person: Jessica Manzi <br /> Mailing Address: 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA 94063 <br /> E-Mail Address: imanzi @redwoodcity.org Telephone: 650-780-7372 <br /> Secondary Contact(in event primary not available): Susan Wheeler <br /> E-Mail Address: swheeler @redwoodcity.org Telephone: 650-780-7245 <br /> Short Title Description of Project: Safe Routes to School Improvement Project <br /> Amount of claim: $46,220 <br /> Functional Description of Project: <br /> Install pedestrian improvements around Redwood City School District elementary schools to increase the safety of children walking and biking to school. <br /> Proposed improvements include: updating school warning signage and pavement markings. <br /> Financial Plan: <br /> List the project elements for which TDA funding is being requested (e.g., planning, environmental, engineering, right-of-way, construction, <br /> inspection, contingency, audit). Use the table below to show the project budget. Include prior and proposed future funding of the project. If the <br /> project is a segment of a larger project, include prior and proposed funding sources for the other segments. <br /> Project Elements: Engineering,construction, inspection, and contingency. <br /> Funding Source I All Prior FYs I Application FY I Next FY I Following FYs I Totals <br /> TDA Article 3 $5,000 $41,220 $46,220 <br /> list all other sources: <br /> 1. San Mateo County $976,780 $976,780 <br /> Measure A grant <br /> (applied) <br /> 2. City funding $100,000 $100,000 <br /> 3.Safe Routes to $76,500 $76,500 <br /> School grant <br /> 4. Future grants <br /> Totals $76,500 $5,000 $1,118,000 $1,199,500 <br /> Project Eligibility: YES?/NO? <br /> A. Has the project been approved by the claimants governing body? (If"NO,"provide the approximate date approval is Anticipated <br /> anticipated). Jan.27,2014 <br /> B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If"YES,"provide an explanation on a separate page. NO <br /> C. For"bikeways,"does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California YES <br /> Highway Design Manual?(Available on the internet via: http://www.dot.ca.gov). <br /> D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee?(If"NO,"provide an explanation). YES,see note <br /> The project has been reviewed by the San Mateo County Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and Redwood City's <br /> Bicycle Working Group which is comprised of local bicyclists and pedestrians, including members who live in Redwood City. <br /> E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project(pursuant to CEQA)been YES <br /> evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder? (required only for projects that <br /> include construction). <br /> F. Will the project be completed before the allocation expires? Enter the anticipated completion date of project(month and YES <br /> year)June 2016 <br /> G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility,or has the claimant arranged for such YES <br /> maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name: <br /> ATTY/RESO.2942/MTC ALLOCATION OF FY 13-14 <br /> REV:01-23-14 JS <br /> MTC Programming and Allocations Section April 2005 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 3 <br />