Laserfiche WebLink
<br />not before us tonight for a final decision, but that is, what to do with the additional monies, <br />and not just what to do with it in terms of putting it in a pot in a general sense, but the <br />criteria regarding which the expenditure of that money might be measured against. With <br />respect to that third function, I think we ought to refer the entire issue back to the Housing <br />and Human Concerns Committee to have them give it a comprehensive look and a formal <br />recommendation to us, if this deal is approve as proposed. I don't think we need to have a <br />sense of urgency in terms of their recommendation to us, because that money is going to <br />come in over time and there are issues related to whether or not we in effect use the net <br />present value of it in a way that there is a loan from the General Fund, or Reserves, so that <br />in effect it is cashed out and paid back. There are a whole variety of circumstances. I <br />would prefer to have that come back to us after the HHCC has had a full deliberative <br />process." Council Member Hartnett said if that is the case, then what was before the <br />Council tonight was the interdependent decision of approving the Resolution regarding the <br />revised preliminary official statement and the enhanced financial terms. <br />Finance Director Ponty said that was correct, and the Council was being asked if it <br />wished to "approve the preliminary Official statement so that this deal could move <br />forward." Director Ponty said the expenditure of those funds could be folded into the <br />budget process if the Council so chose. He said that if the Council's decision took place <br />outside the budget process it would take another ordinance to appropriate those funds. <br />In response to Council Member Claire's questions, Director Ponty said the Age Institute <br />is a non-profit organization and the parent company of Woodside Advanced Senior Care. <br />He advised that Woodside Advanced Senior Care "will be purchasing the facility. ARV <br />will be managing the facility under contract with Woodside Advanced Senior Care. There <br />are really three players involved." He said the real owner will be the Age Institute. <br />Council Member Bain said he was Chairman of the HHCC during the February 9 <br />Council meeting, and the Committee "did not make any recommendations as to what the <br />Council should do simply because we did not have the information at our fingertips. The <br />bulk of what I had to say that night was that the HHCC should have been brought into the <br />loop originally, which it has this time, and I'm glad to see that." <br />In response to Council Member Bain's questions, Joe Litten, financial advisor to <br />Woodside Advanced Senior Care Inc., said he had done almost 200 of these types of <br />multi-family bond financings and 10 to 20% were senior facilities. He said sometimes the <br />fees are put into the General Fund and sometimes they are appropriated for housing <br />purposes. He said Millbrae, Contra Costa County, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, <br />San Diego and San Jose have all been involved in similar bond issuances. <br />MIS: CLAIRE/HARTNETT. TITLE READ. <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF REVISED <br />OFFICIAL STATEMENT FOR CITY OF REDWOOD CITY SENIOR LIVING <br />FACILITIES REVENUE BONDS (WOODSIDE TERRACE) SERIES 1998; <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 APRIL 27,1998 <br />MINUTES Page No. 428 PAGE 25 <br />