Laserfiche WebLink
<br />rates and fixed costs as a way to begin creating an adjustment or some mechanism to <br />manage the increase. We can't just throw this on the back of seniors who are living on <br />fixed incomes. The committee is sensitive to that. It is a very difficult challenge to do <br />both, but we need to find a way to achieve" it. <br />In response to Mr. MiKibbon's questions regarding the use of the Utility Tax, City <br />Manager Everett said it could be used for any capital improvement projects, and it <br />would be up to the Council to decide which priorities it wished to fund through that tax. <br />CONSENSUS: Mayor Howard determined that it was the consensus of the Council <br />to accept the report from the Utilities Committee and support its recommendations. <br /> MINUTE ORDER NO. 98-112 <br />Mayor Howard commended the Committee and staff on the Report and the work they <br />did on this very difficult issue. <br />Director Ingram advised that the staff would "bring back pieces that are in the front end <br />of that coordinator and CIP recommendations for short term items. We'll make sure that <br />in the operating budget there is a request for supporting the rate study.... You'll see them <br />again in the CIP budget review and the final operating budget reviews in June." <br />3) Water Enterprise Fund <br />Review Water Enterprise Guiding Principles <br />Rates and Service Charges Scenarios for FY 1998/99 <br />Proposed 5-Year Capital Improvement Program Budget <br />Public Works Services Department Budget Request - Significant Change Requests <br />Joint Recommendation - Utilities Committee and Staff <br />Director Ingram said, "The Water Enterprise Fund is separate from all the other <br />activities, like the Sewer Fund. This part is actually fairly straightforward.... The <br />unanimous recommendation from the Utilities Committee is Scenario 1B (Report on file <br />in the City Clerk Department.)... Basically there are two things going on that are <br />important in terms of the water bills in Redwood City. One is... the wholesale rate." <br />Director Ingram described why that rate will fluctuate wildly over the next couple of years <br />due to contractual constraints and inflexibility of the supplier, San Francisco Water. He <br />said the recommendation is for Redwood City not to follow suit, but to keep the lifeline <br />rate stable over two years, and at that time begin to marry the lifeline rate to the wholesale <br />rate. <br />Director Ingram said the City's internal costs, the operation, and the maintenance of the <br />system drive the other piece of the water bill. He said the average cost increase was about <br />3.5% distributed over a four-year period. Director Ingram said the Committee strongly <br />recommended approving the four year projection and building the cost of living increase <br />into that number eventually stabilizing it. He referred to the report that showed the <br />Study Session MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 May 4,1998 <br />Minutes Page No. 448 Page 17 <br />