Laserfiche WebLink
<br />___n________n______--------------------------------------------------------------______n_________n______n_-_-- <br />2) Storm Water Management Program / Flooding Issues (802) <br />REPORT; Utilities Committee of the City Council, May 4,1998 <br />Update: Discussions with Friendly Acres and Centennial Neighborhood Associations <br />Update: February Storms Damage Repairs and Discussions with FEMA <br />Proposed Next Steps in Addressing Flooding Problems <br />Vice Mayor Ruskin, Chairman of the Council Utilities Committee, said he would <br />concentrate his remarks on a specific aspect of the far ranging Report, the most <br />challenging aspect of it - flooding of various neighborhoods in Redwood City. He said, <br />"the flooding has bought an outpouring of feeling recently, because of advent of EI Nino, <br />which was in a sense the straw that broke the camel's back. Recently there have been a <br />series of meetings in the neighborhoods.... at Fair Oaks the Neighborhood Association as <br />well as the special Flood Committee of that Neighborhood where I was present <br />representing Mayor Howard. Peter Ingram and staff were present. The Centennial <br />Neighborhood Association meeting with special emphasis and discussion about the <br />flooding where both the Mayor and I were present along with Peter and staff. <br />"Before the flooding occurred the Utilities Committee made a decision to look into the <br />flooding to see if we could come up with a plan to provide a solution to the challenge. I'm <br />here tonight to talk about the recommendation of the Utility Committee. It is a <br />unanimous recommendation. There are three members on the Committee, Council <br />Member Dick Claire who is not here tonight, Council Member Jeff Ira and myself. <br />"We have a strong, unanimous recommendation, that we face the problem. And we have <br />looked into the situation and think there is only one workable approach to the problem. It <br />is a massive problem demanding significant resources in the millions of dollars. And we <br />feel there is only one workable approach and that is, to combine the sanitary sewer system <br />with the capital improvement of the storm drainage system into one Enterprise Fund. The <br />purpose of that would be to be able to issue Revenue Bonds. We feel that the issuance of <br />Revenue Bonds is the only workable option that the City has to face the challenge of <br />flooding.... We also feel strongly that it is the right thing to do, not only because we are <br />all in this together, and what affects one neighborhood really ought to affect us all, but <br />also because everybody who is upstream contributes to the run-off that eventually impacts <br />the bottom of the basin in the neighborhoods where flooding occurs. It is also imprudent <br />to continue to operate in the way we have, because we are forced into a reactive mode. <br />And every winter when there is a serious storm problem, the entire Public Works Services <br />Department is forced to go into a reactive mode rather than to be in a proactive mode able <br />to do the work we really want them to do. <br />"Although we are unanimously recommending that we take action on this, we also want <br />to bring up the fact that it is a multi-agency problem. It is not simply Redwood City that <br />needs to deal with this. The County needs to be brought in because its run-off is part of <br />Study Session MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 May 4, 1998 <br />Minutes Page No. 440 Page 9 <br />