Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Vice Mayor Ruskin said the Council School Liaison Committee (Council Members <br />Hartnett and Ruskin) had been involved in these meetings designed to create ways to share <br />costs regarding expanded gymnasiums and coordinating activities. He said that report <br />would be presented at the next Council meeting. Vice Mayor Ruskin said that staff <br />provided County with the costs for new fields, and staff was now looking into what it <br />would cost to renovate one existing field "in such a way to improve it so much that it <br />would amount to, in effect, a new field." <br />Mayor Howard called upon those people in the audience who wished to speak to the CIP <br />budget items. <br />Pamela Gearhart, 51 Lowell Street, said she has lived right next door to Stafford Park for <br />24 years. She said the park was beautiful but could use some renovation. Mrs. Gearhart <br />said the proposed plans were beautiful, but would over develop the park. She said she was <br />concerned about all the new play equipment right behind her house, the water play area <br />right where the park lost an oak tree, a permanent bandstand for six concerts a year when <br />that area could be used to a better advantage, and the drainage. Mrs. Gearhart said she <br />hoped that the park would be kept aesthetically pleasing and that the play equipment blend <br />in with the natural colors of the park. She said it was very important that the restrooms be <br />redone. <br />Bill O'Callahan, 170 Lowell Street, said his three children play in the park on a daily <br />basis. He said he loved Stafford for its simplicity and the new design challenged that <br />simplicity and the value of the park. Mr. O'Callal1an said the plans needed to be <br />simplified in many ways, the water play structure was out of character for the area, and the <br />new plans decreased the number of swings. He said he concurred with Mrs. Gearhart, that <br />the current design needed to be revisited and simplified to blend in with the character of <br />the neighborhood. <br />Al Diaz, 50 King Street, said he had supported Stafford park renovation plans at the last <br />Council meeting discussion, but now believed it would be better to slow down the process <br />and review the designs. He asked the Council not to confuse support for renovation with <br />support for a specific design. Mr. Diaz said the Council had received over 70 letters <br />asking it to simplify the plans. He said he had visited the park in Campbell designed by <br />the City's consultants, and the water play area there was a "muddy, dirty, sandy hole" that <br />parents were keeping their children out of. Mr. Diaz said it didn't keep the sand out of the <br />drinking fountain, in fact sand was everywhere. He said that $525,000 was a lot of money, <br />and he described simpler renovations that could be done for a lot less money with better <br />results. Mr. Diaz said deferring the cost of the restrooms to a later date was not really <br />staying within budget. He said the park need picnic tables and benches and better drainage <br />and those needs weren't even addressed in the current budget. He said, "You could <br />probably take $100,000 off this budget, and still do an adequate job of providing new <br />bathrooms, new playground equipment, picnic areas, and have a park everyone will <br />continue to love." <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 MAY 11, 1998 <br />MINUTES Page No. 470 PAGE 21 <br />