CC Min 1998-06-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

any particular provisions of the Brown Act that we should provide attention to, so that we don't unintentionally or otherwise transgress any such provisions.... I would like, if! can, to have Council Member Leipzig point to a particular provision of the Brown Act that he feels that he has read and feels we have perhaps transgressed." Council Member Leipzig said, "I notice that Agenda Item Seven, this entire area is limited to fifteen minutes, and I think we have gone beyond that so I'll make it very brief. I was not prepared to speak on this item tonight. But yes, a couple of quick areas that I think you need to look at carefully. One, the reporting out, that means, once the Council is in a legitimately closed session and we take an action, we are required by the Brown Act to announce that immediately, or as close as possible. Generally that means coming down here, we meet upstairs, in open session, with the public and press here, and announcing what decisions we have made. Number two is the area of coaching officers, Council Members and each other, by the staff, on what to say, other than process. And I understand there is a difference between preparing for potential litigation, but coaching on answers and process and what would be best is not acceptable under the Brown Act. And thirdly, very briefly, strategy. We had a session a few months back where we talked about road options on the other side of 101. It was clearly not a topic for closed session. It should have been held in this room with the charts and the graphs that we looked at which the staff presented to us, so that the people here and the press could hear and have input on what we were talking about." Council Member Hartnett said, "What I asked was what, if any, particular provisions of the Brown Act, which is found in the Government Code, have you read Council Member Leipzig, that serve as a foundation for your statement?" Council Member Leipzig said, "I just answered that question. I don't have the Code Section on the Brown Act with me. I am not prepared, I did not know this was going on the agenda. If you had called me in advance I would have been prepared. I would be happy to discuss this with you at a later time." Council Member Hartnett asked Council Member Leipzig if he had read any legal treatises or legal consultants analyses of the Brown Act, and the scope of discussion that is allowed under the Brown Act, or the subject matters that can be discussed in closed sessions "that serve as a foundation for your statements." Council Member Leipzig said, "Yes, I am aware of the Brown Act and its provisions. But I'm not on trial here, Counselor, so I suggest that we move on." Council Member Hartnett said, "You made certain statements of fact in your press release, and it is apparent to me in your comments that those statements in fact have no basis. For example, in your press release you indicated that over 90% of City Council meetings held in the past seven months have been preceded by closed door meetings. And the fact is that City records absolutely, positively do not back up that statement.... In the prior seven meetings of the Council at the time that press release had been issued, six of REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 JUNE 22,1998 MINUTES Page No. 582 PAGE 20