CC Min 1997-11-17 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

- - "' -, defines anything below 75 feet as low-rise. The Uniform Building Code defines anything above 75 feet as requiring life safety provisions in the building which are colloquially - called high-rise. There is no mention in the UBC of ... low-rise, and in fact that is irrelevant to the issue of architectural compatibility." Mr. Gibson said the City had the unilateral right to interpret what low-rise meant within some logical context. Mr. Gibson said the proposed building is a very large mass more suited to a downtown commercial area or office park, not in or near a residential area. Mr. Gibson said this building is at least a mile from other commercial areas in Redwood Shores. He said the "primary request here is that the Project be redesigned within the context of what the Architectural permit has the authority to review, and in context with the Lido Specific Plan, and not focusing on what is really a red herring, about the zoning... The issues of traffic... are important, but they are not really the main issue. The main issues are compatibility with the neighborhood, they are not congestion management issues. They are issues on how the traffic affects the neighborhood, not how the traffic affects the traffic... The key issue is, we would ask that the City take whatever (means) it thinks it has, to cause this Project to be redesigned as a more residential scale, lower Project that would be in keeping with the Lido Specific Plan." In answer to Couneilman Claire's question regarding approval of the apartment development, Mr. Gibson said he was part of that process, and the complex was equivalent to a two-story office building, approximately 35 feet high. He said a four-story office building is about 60 feet high. Mr. Gibson said, in comparison, the office building was much, much larger than all the other surrounding structures. - Don Warren, Stonybrook Associates, spoke to the issue of "the agreement between the City of Redwood City, Redwood Shores Properties, and SBSA at the time the Lido Special Area Plan was being negotiated. Redwood Shores Properties, of which I was then the President, submitted to the City of Redwood City a proposal for the Lido development which included Parcel 7 at that time which included the two parcels that are now the subject of this discussion, as an all residential project. That was the original proposal, and it was part of the 640 unit residential proposal that was put before the City. As part of those deliberations, the SBSA, the regional sewage treatment facility, of which Redwood City, San Carlos, Belmont, Menlo Park, rightly so, challenged our desire at that time to put residential so close to the SBSA plant. And they were very articulate in expressing why they were concerned about that. Their concern was expressed in a number of public hearings and in written form. Hearings that were available to the entire community and attended by representatives of the entire community, including the community of Redwood Shores.." Mr. Warren said Redwood Shores Properties was not happy with what SBSA wanted initially, but a compromise agreement was reached, with him representing Redwood Shores Properties, Jim Bewley representing SBSA and the City Manager for the City. Mr. Warren said the compromise is now embodied in the General Plan and designates that site as commercially zoned. He said although many types of commercial uses were discussed, "but no certainty as to what that might be." Mr. Warren said all three parties agreed upon the "CG" zone as it allowed for a 75 foot height limit. He said, "the - agreement was a well thought out and well negotiated agreement... And SBSA's concern REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 NOVEMBER 17.1997 MINUTES Page No. 049 PAGE 18