My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1997-06-02
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CC Min 1997-06-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:44:26 PM
Creation date
4/6/2004 9:10:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/2/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I I: I II <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Councilwoman Buchan referred to the Minutes of the October, 1995 appeal hearing, <br />- and said, "I saw my own comments at the end where I expressed my extreme <br />disappointment that a compromise could not have been worked out. I still feel that <br />way. After reading all the material from staff, reading all the letters, making a trip to <br />the neighborhood to see if anything had changed since October, 1995, I discovered that <br />it hadn't. And after listening to everyone tonight, I find that I feel much the same as I <br />did last time. That is why I supported the motion. It isn't working here. The key <br />word is, it is not a neighborly thing. Just so you all understand, I too, don't do things <br />by political expediency. I am doing it because my conscience tells me this is right." <br /> <br />Councilman Ruskin said, "I find this a very difficult decision. There are a couple of <br />items that stood out more than anything else that have enabled me to make a decision, <br />although I must tell you, for the first hour and a half, I wasn't sure how I was going to <br />come to a decision, because I wasn't able to find that thread that seerned to lead to at <br />least my own truth. Also interesting to me, while Council Member Buchan was <br />speaking about compromise, I had just written compromise and put a box around it <br />before she said that. We have had two public hearings this evening. The essence of <br />the first one was to try to induce both parties to find a compromise, and I am <br />suggesting that a compromise would be in the best interests of both parties here, long <br />term. What is most persuasive to me in all the arguments made has to do with the <br />location. I don't have a mental data base of all the places of worship in Redwood City <br />and where exactly they are, but as I recall those, and in hearing testimony tonight... It <br />-- seems like the churches that have parking lots that have a large amount of ingress and <br />egress are situated in such a way that they don't disrupt a small neighborhood. I am <br />thinking of the churches on Woodside and Valota, the synagogue on Alameda, the <br />West Bay Christian Academy which has an entrance on Vera and an entrance on <br />Madison. There are certain things about them that I think lend themselves better to a <br />large flow of cars in and out. My instincts tell me that it isn't appropriate here. And <br />that to me is the decisive factor that it moves right into the back yards of many people, <br />it requires easements, building over aquaducts.... And it just feels inappropriate. I am <br />going to vote to grant the appeal, but I also hope that both sides will be able to find a <br />compromise over the next several years. I hope we are not asked to reconsider the <br />same exact point in a year and halffrom now." <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Howard said, "We have many churches in Redwood City already.... In <br />my neighborhood alone I know of at least six churches. I am very comfortable with <br />having churches in my neighborhood. We encourage it in Redwood City. We are not <br />being asked to enlarge a church here. We are not being asked to enlarge a <br />congregation. What we are being asked to do is to approve a piece of land for parking <br />because the church is taking the initiative of buying a piece of property so they could <br />come up with a compromise for the neighborhood. They not only house visiting <br />dignitaries or people within their church congregation who come to stay for a period of <br />time, they are also willing to put their own time and sweat and money into making <br />- additional parking so they can in fact get more parking off the street. Most of our <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 55 JUNE2,1997 <br />MINUTES Page No. 381 PAGE 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.