Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . I I . [ . - <br /> <br /> Director Ponty said the unknowns included Area 8 fire protection services which has <br /> recently been resolved although there is a loss of $50,000 in revenue; the results of the <br /> - police staffmg study are yet to be determined; and it is still unknown what if any <br /> revenues will be retumed by the State to cities under the Educational Revenue <br /> Augmentation Funds (ERAF.) <br /> Director Ponty described ERAF, the property tax reduction taken by the State from <br /> California cities, counties and special districts, and the range of possible revenues to be <br /> returned by the state, between $100 million to $280 million. Director Ponty said the <br /> state has returned some funds under Proposition 172 which retained the statewide Y, <br /> cent sales tax, but the net loss was still over $1.7 Billion statewide. The proposed $280 <br /> million, the most optimistic expectation, is still far from making up the net loss <br /> experienced by the cities, counties and special districts in the State. Director Ponty <br /> said "Redwood City is about $2.3 million poorer, $2.3 million less revenue to work <br /> with as a result ofERAF. We do receive about $440,000 per year... which still leaves <br /> us with a $1.9 million net loss. There is still quite a way to go for the state to make the <br /> cities whole." <br /> Director Ponty showed an overhead of an optimistic view of the bottom line for the <br /> next five years (pages 14 and 15 of the Report.) He said it did not incorporate the <br /> effects of the new contract for fire protection services in Area No.8, which would <br /> result in a projected deficit of around $45,000. In the year 2000/2001 the total budget <br /> deficit projected is $212,000, which is one tenth of one percent to one half of one <br /> - percent of projected revenues. Director Ponty said, "It is as close to balanced, <br /> realistically, as we could expect at this point." <br /> Director Ponty showed an overhead of Sales Tax by Economic Category (page 3 of <br /> the Report) through the 4th quarter of 1996. He reminded the Council of the jump in <br /> sales tax from business to business sales that occurred in the 2nd and 3'd quarters of <br /> 1996, the slight decrease in the 4th quarter, and again explained that this category is <br /> extremely volatile and unpredictable. He explained that these sales represent software <br /> sales between businesses, and said that the new service of selling and distributing <br /> software through downloading over the Internet rather than handling disks would <br /> significantly cut into sales tax revenues, permanently. Director Ponty advised that the <br /> "State Board of Equalization has taken the position that this process is not an exchange <br /> of tangible property, and therefore it is exempt from sales tax." Efforts are underway <br /> to have the Board reassess its original decision and reinstate the sales tax for these <br /> types of sales. <br /> In response to Council questions regarding the originally projected larger deficits in the <br /> out years, Director Ponty said the changes affecting the long term projections have <br /> been on the revenue side. "We have revisited the development projections. Initially <br /> we thought much of the build-out would occur much sooner... We expected more of <br /> - that revenue to be coming in sooner. What we have actually done, instead of it coming <br /> in at a peak, it has flattened out. It is spread over the four or five year period. We <br /> ADJOURNED REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 55 JUNE 23, 1997 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 411 PAGE 9 <br />