Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . I , . I . <br /> City of Redwood City how many units it must produce, Associate Planner Riordan said, <br /> "It has to do with Housing Element law. .. The State has determined that there is a shortage <br /> of affordable housing in northern California." <br /> - <br /> Councilman Leipzig said, "I would challenge that process, before we go any further. <br /> Further on in the Report there is a recent letter from ABAG to you. Yes, they agree that <br /> things have changed since 1986-87 including the gobbling up of 1,600 acres in South <br /> Shores which would have accounted for quite a bit of the housing requirements from the <br /> State. So things have changed. I agree with Councilman Ruskin that we have to go slowly <br /> on some of these changes in the neighborhoods. But let's look at the State. The bottom <br /> line with me is, how dare they come into Redwood City and say, you have to do 4,741 <br /> units. Who the heck are they? And that was ten years ago. Who is ABAG? We are the <br /> City of Redwood City. We are the people here who know best. I'm not throwing this on <br /> top of you, I am suggesting this to my colleagues, that we should look at that. Let's talk to <br /> Ted Lempert. Let's talk to Byron Sher. They always claim about doing things for <br /> Redwood City.... 4,741 units, some guy in Sacramento sat there and figured this out, <br /> folks... This is ridiculous. I think we have to challenge the basic premise before we move <br /> forward." <br /> Associate Planner Riordan said the staff letter in the Report is the City's response to the <br /> State, and asked Council for direction about which proposals to continue researching. She <br /> said staff was not reviewing the whole Housing Element at this time, but would bring it to <br /> Council for consideration at the end of 1999. She said it was necessary to respond to the <br /> - State addressing its list of deficiencies in order to receive federal funding for future <br /> housing developments. <br /> In response to Council questions regarding the Housing Element approval process and <br /> eligibility for federal funds, City Attorney Schricker said, "The State Planning Act <br /> makes mandatory a Housing Element of the General Plan of the City. In implementation <br /> of that, sorne authority is designated to ABAG to implement the requirement, particularly <br /> in respect to affordable housing. The affordable housing aspect, or element, there are <br /> several elements, is given a great deal of priority by the State. In implementation of that, <br /> ABAG, which has approval, authority or allocation authority in respect to certain funds, is <br /> used as the stick, so to speak, in context of administering State law, and the mandatory <br /> requirements. At the time the allocation came out a few years ago, the reaction of Council <br /> was quite similar to your reaction in the sense that something seemed to have been wrong <br /> in the numbers. They were so high for Redwood City. Obviously staff has tried to work <br /> with ABAG to modify that, and perhaps further efforts could be made in that regard. But, <br /> apparently the State and ABAG have been relatively unsympathetic to those changes. But <br /> it does seem... that the allocation to Redwood City seemed extremely disproportionate to <br /> its ability to produce." <br /> - <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 55 OCTOBER 27,1997 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 623 PAGE 7 <br />