My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-05-12 Joint with Planning
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-05-12 Joint with Planning
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2014 10:20:56 AM
Creation date
5/8/2014 4:38:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/12/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
519
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.1.B. - Page 59 <br /> Appendix G - Helpful Hints for Applicants <br /> Are the following components included in the application package? <br /> • SF 424, SF 424A, SF 424B, SF LLL <br /> • IJs for projects <br /> • Detailed budgets containing only allowable costs and demonstrating cost share <br /> • Vulnerability assessments/security plan certification (if applicable) <br /> Are the following items addressed within the IJ narratives and detailed budgets? <br /> • Do the IJ and the detailed budget only include allowable costs? <br /> • Are all of the expenses in the detailed budget addressed in the IJ narrative? (For <br /> example, a camera equipment budget line item should be addressed in narrative <br /> form in the IJ as it pertains to the overall security program.) <br /> • Does the information in the detailed budget align with the budget summary in the <br /> IJ narrative? <br /> • Are planning and design costs clearly delineated in the budget, as separate from <br /> implementation/installation costs? (Planning and design costs may be released <br /> before implementation/installation costs, as planning and design costs do not <br /> require extensive EHP review.) <br /> • Does the IJ clearly explain how the projects fit into a funding priority area (as identified <br /> in Appendix B—PSGP Priorities.)? <br /> • Does the IJ align with one or more core capabilities in the Goal? <br /> • Does the IJ discuss how this investment will specifically address one or more of the <br /> project effectiveness groups identified in the current year's grant guidance? <br /> • Does the IJ discuss how this investment will decrease or mitigate risk? <br /> • Is the cost effectiveness of the project clearly explained in the H? How does this project <br /> provide a high security return on investment? <br /> • Are timelines realistic and detailed? <br /> • Are possible hurdles addressed in a clear and concise fashion? <br /> • Does the M&A total no more than five percent (5%) of the total award? <br /> Appendix G- FY14 PSGP Helpful Hints for Applicants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.