My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1996-01-29
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CC Min 1996-01-29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:44:49 PM
Creation date
4/6/2004 10:09:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/29/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> . . , . - <br /> <br /> Project being sold to someone who would not have that same commitment, and it <br /> would avoid a "takings claim." <br /> '--- <br /> Mark Adams, Sims LMC Recyclers, 699 Seaport Blvd., Manager of Environmental, <br /> Governmental and Regulatory Affairs, responded to Council's earlier questions stating <br /> Sims LMC was bought in 1987 by a very large publicly owned scrap metal recycling <br /> Australian company which bought many other recycling companies at that time. Mr. <br /> Adams advised that Sims LMC is the largest contributor to the Port's coffers. He <br /> described Sims LMC's new lease with the Port, his company's large vested interest at <br /> the Port and future expansion plans. <br /> Mr. Adams described the distinctions between the Lincoln development location and <br /> the proposed Pacific Shores Center relating to possibility of complaints. Mr. Adams <br /> stated that their truck traffic studies show traffic far in excess of that described in the <br /> EIR, and the ErR did not take into account compatibility issues, such as the vast <br /> number of new cars occupying the same road as scrap trucks. He advised that the dust <br /> and noise issues would always be a subject of controversy no matter what is built there. <br /> Mr. Adams stated that Sims LMC had no interest in moving ITom the Port, it was a <br /> deepwater port on San Francisco Bay with good truck and rail service, a unique place <br /> in the Bay Area. He addressed the concerns of management and other Port tenants that <br /> they would eventually be forced out of the Port by encroaching development of an <br /> incompatible nature. Mr. Adams stated that "once we are gone, the Port will go the <br /> --- way of other ports in other industrial areas and will be taken over by similar uses to <br /> those doing the pushing out, so to speak." <br /> Mr. Adams referred to "the old airport syndrome" where residential areas are built up <br /> around airports, and then residents complain about the airport. <br /> Mr. Adams said he shared Mr. Bautista's vision for a wonderful place to take children <br /> and have an interactive experience, but suggested that the historical signs will describe <br /> the long lost heavy industrial companies that now do business at the Port. <br /> Mr. Adams summed up by saying the proposed prezoning was premature, preceding <br /> BCDC and LAFCO, and precede any development agreement to be made, and urged <br /> Council to step back and think about all the impacts of such a decision. <br /> In response to Council questions, Mr. Adams described some of Sims LMC's <br /> expansion plans new warehouse space, new recycling services to the public, a new <br /> non-iron business. He described some of the capital improvements planned and their <br /> need for 5 to 10 acres more land. In answering the question regarding "being forced <br /> out" Mr. Adams stated that he meant 20, 30, 40 years ITOm now, and that action being <br /> hastened by a monumental shift in the Port's viewpoint as evidenced by changing 106 <br /> --- acres. "Ten years ago...(no one) could have conceived of the Port would have <br /> approached BCDC and asked for a change of that magnitude....That would have been <br /> Special Meeting Minutes MINUTE BOOK NO. 54 <br /> January 29,1996 Page No. 045 <br /> Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.