Laserfiche WebLink
7.3.B. - Page 1 <br /> REPORT <br /> To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From the City Manager <br /> June 9, 2014 <br /> SUBJECT <br /> Annual Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2014-15 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Adopt a Resolution establishing the appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2014-15. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> In 1979 the voters of the State of California passed Proposition 4, the Gann spending <br /> limit initiative (most recently amended in 1990 by Proposition 111). The initiative <br /> establishes and defines annual appropriation limits for state and local government <br /> entities and requires that the City adopt an appropriations limit annually. Moreover, the <br /> initiative provides for annual adjustments for changes in population (for the City or <br /> County, whichever is greater) and either the statewide percentage change in per capita <br /> personal income or percentage change in assessed valuation attributable to growth in <br /> non-residential new construction. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> The recommended appropriations limit for FY 2014-15 is $573,095,639 while the limit <br /> for FY 2013-14 was $548,582,152. The estimated proceeds of taxes for FY 2014-15 are <br /> only $85,088,000, well below the $573,095,639 legal limit. The increase from FY 2013- <br /> 14 is primarily due to the increase (2.39%) in the assessed valuation attributable to <br /> growth in non-residential new construction, one of the factors used in calculating the <br /> change in the appropriation limit. <br /> The attachment displays the calculations utilized to arrive at this amount. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> There are no practical alternatives as Article XIIIB of the State Constitution requires that <br /> the state and all local entities adopt an appropriations limit annually. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> There is no fiscal impact associated with adopting the recommended appropriations <br /> limit as the appropriation of the proceeds of taxes is well under the recommended limit. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> This ordinance is not a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental <br /> Quality Act. (Public Resource Code § 21065; Guidelines § 15378). <br />