My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-06-09 Closed and Joint SA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-06-09 Closed and Joint SA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2014 10:56:01 AM
Creation date
6/5/2014 5:19:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
6/9/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
392
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fnnhmen+ <br /> 9.A. - Page 44 <br /> CBID are for services, programs and improvements directly benefiting each individual parcel <br /> within this area and support increased cleanliness, commerce, business attraction and <br /> retention, increased property rental income and improved District identity. No CBID funded <br /> services, activities or programs will be provided beyond the CBID boundaries. <br /> While every attempt is made to provide CBID services and programs to confer benefits only to <br /> those identified assessed parcels within the CBID, the California State Constitution was <br /> amended via Proposition 218 to stipulate that general benefits exist, either by design or <br /> unintentional, in all assessment districts and that a portion of the program costs must be <br /> considered attributable to general benefits and assigned a value. General benefits cannot be <br /> funded by assessment revenues. General benefits might be conferred on parcels within the <br /> District, or "spillover" onto parcels surrounding the District, or to the public at large who might <br /> be passing through the District with no intention of transacting business within the District or <br /> interest in the District itself. <br /> Conventional assessment engineering experience has found that general benefits within a given <br /> district tend to range from 2-5% of the total costs. There are three methods that have been <br /> used by the Assessment Engineer for determining general and special benefit ratios within <br /> assessment districts: <br /> (1) The parcel by parcel allocation method <br /> (2) The program/activity line item allocation method, and <br /> (3) The composite district overlay determinant method. <br /> A majority of CBIDs or PBIDs in California for which the Assessment Engineer has provided <br /> assessment engineering services since the enactment of Proposition 218, have used Method #3, <br /> the composite district overlay determinant method which will be used for the Downtown <br /> Redwood City District CBID. This method of computing the value of general benefit involves a <br /> composite of two distinct types of general benefit — benefit to the public at large within the <br /> District and benefit to parcels outside the District. <br /> Separate General Benefits from Special Benefits and Related Costs (Prop 218): <br /> Total costs are estimated at $ 781,035 (see Table below). General benefits are factored at 3% of <br /> total (see Finding 2 on page 6 of the Assessment Engineer's report) with special benefits set at <br /> 97%. Prop 218 limits the levy of property assessments to costs attributed to special benefits <br /> only. The 3% general benefit cost is computed to be $ 24,612 with a resultant 97% special <br /> benefit limit computed at $ 795,781. This is the maximum amount of revenue that can be <br /> derived from property assessments from the subject CBID. The total amount of revenue <br /> proposed to be derived from CBID assessments and general benefits for Year 1 is $ 820,393.00. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.