Laserfiche WebLink
05/22/2017 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 15588 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD <br />CITY DENYING THE APPEAL AND APPROVING A DOWNTOWN <br />PLANNED COMMUNITY PERMIT INCLUDING FIFTEEN GUIDELINE <br />DEVIATIONS, TENTATIVE MAP, CONDOMINIUM PERMIT, PLANNED <br />DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, DENSITY BONUS PARKING RATIO AND <br />PARKING REDUCTION FOR 612 JEFFERSON AVENUE PURSUANT TO <br />THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY'S DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN, <br />SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT FEE <br />ORDINANCE <br />WHEREAS, the Applicant, Habitat for Humanity Greater San Francisco, submitted an <br />application for a Downtown Planned Community Permit, Tentative Map, Condominium <br />Permit, and a Planned Development Permit, later supplemented by a request for a Density <br />Bonus Parking Ratio and DTPP Parking Reduction, for a new 6 -story residential condominium <br />building consisting of 20 residential units at 612 Jefferson Avenue (the "Project"), which is <br />located within the Downtown Precise Plan area (DTPP); and <br />WHEREAS, on October 20, 2016, and December 1, 2016, the Architectural Advisory <br />Committee (AAC) conducted public hearings to consider the proposed fifteen (15) deviations <br />from the DTPP guidelines pertaining to the ground floor frontage length, rear yard size, <br />building base, middle, and top cap heights, plinth design, base articulations, bay windows, <br />window inset depth, window proportions, and changes in color. The AAC found that fourteen <br />(14) of the proposed deviations are consistent with the spirit and intent of the DTPP, and <br />unanimously recommended Planning Commission approval of those fourteen (14) deviations. <br />The AAC also found that the proposed deviation for the minimum rear yard size was not <br />consistent with the spirit and intent of the DTPP, and unanimously recommended Planning <br />Commission denial of the deviation unless the Applicant revised the Project to meet the <br />guideline; or, alternatively, make the rear yard area common open space, provide common <br />open space elsewhere, or provide private open space for the majority of the units; and <br />WHEREAS, on November 17, 2016, the Historic Resources Advisory Committee <br />(HRAC) conducted a public hearing to consider whether the proposed Project would create <br />a substantial adverse change in the significance of the adjacent historic resources located at <br />620 Jefferson Avenue, 605 Middlefield Road, and 611 Middlefield Road. The HRAC <br />considered the historic analysis report prepared by Richard Brandi, and agreed with its <br />conclusions that: (1) the Project would not have any adverse effects on the historic resources, <br />and (2) that the historic resources would remain eligible to be listed on the California Register. <br />The HRAC voted 4-0 to recommend that the Planning Commission determine that the Project <br />at 612 Jefferson Avenue would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of <br />the surrounding historic resources, and that they will remain eligible for listing in the California <br />Register of Historic Places; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Redwood City is empowered by <br />the Subdivision Ordinance of the Redwood City Municipal Code to act upon applications for <br />Tentative Maps and Condominium Permits, and by the Downtown Precise Plan and Zoning <br />Ordinance to act upon applications for Downtown Planned Community and Planned <br />Development Permits; and <br />ATTY/RESO.0048/CC RE50 612JEFFERSON (HABITAT) APPEAL RESO. NO. 15588 <br />REV: 05-23-17 VR MUFF NO, 603 <br />Page 1 of 22 <br />