My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res06 14699
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2000-2009
>
Res06 14699
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 9:55:27 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 9:55:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/27/2006
Description
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PLACEMENT OF A PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ON THE NOVEMBER 2006 STATEWIDE BALLOT TO ENSURE 2002 PROPOSITION 42 REVENUES ARE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THEIR INTENDED STATE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PURPOSES AND TO REIMBURSE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR SUCH FUNDS PREVIOUSLY DIVERTED BY THE STATE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3/27/2006 <br /> <br />ORIGINAL <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 14699 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PLACEMENT OF A PROPOSED <br />CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ON THE NOVEMBER 2006 <br />STATEWIDE BALLOT TO ENSURE 2002 PROPOSITION 42 <br />REVENUES ARE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THEIR INTENDED STATE <br />AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PURPOSES AND TO REIMBURSE <br />LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR SUCH FUNDS PREVIOUSLY <br />DIVERTED BY THE STATE <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Redwood City engages in periodic capital improvement <br /> <br />assessments and planning relating to the condition of its transportation infrastructure; <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City is concerned that it is not able to maintain its transportation <br /> <br />infrastructure consistent with public works best practices because of limited funding <br /> <br />availability; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, constraints on the City's ability to fully fund local transportation <br /> <br />infrastructure projects adversely affect residents, visitors, and businesses within the <br /> <br />City; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City had anticipated receiving monies for this purpose as the <br /> <br />result of Proposition 42, approved by California voters in March 2002, which dedicated <br /> <br />the state sales tax paid on gasoline to state and local transportation infrastructure <br /> <br />projects and programs; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Proposition 42 contains a provision that allows the state to transfer <br /> <br />the sales tax on gasoline to non-transportation state purposes during times of fiscal <br /> <br />need; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, as a result, some $2.5 billion in Proposition 42 monies has been so <br /> <br />transferred and spent over the past three years for non-transportation purposes; and <br /> <br />Atty/Reso/Reso.1601 <br />030606 <br /> <br />14699 <br />Muff# 307 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.