Laserfiche WebLink
<br />." <br /> <br />"DES:ern <br /> <br />10/2/70 <br />OR\GH~t\~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />6J?i/ <br /> <br />DeT 12 '7fJ <br /> <br />RES 0 L UTI 0 N <br />---------- <br /> <br />N O. <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />RESOLurrION ANNEXING LANDS TO GENERAL IMPROVEMENT <br />DISTRICT NO. 1-64 OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED, DETE~~INED AND ORDERED BY THE COUNCIL OF <br /> <br />THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />1. That there is presently on file in the office of the <br /> <br />city Clerk a petition for the annexation of the hereinafter <br /> <br />described lands to General Improvement District No. 1-64 of <br /> <br />the City of Redwood City, a district formed pursuant to the <br /> <br />provisions of Ordinance No. 1128 by the adoption of Resolution <br /> <br />No. 4274 on May 4, 1964, which petition has been signed by the <br /> <br />owners of all of the lands to be annexed. <br /> <br />2. That the Clerk of the City of Redwood City has checked <br /> <br />the petition and has certified to this Council the sufficiency <br /> <br />of the signatures on the petition which certification is <br /> <br />presently on file in the office of the City Clerk. <br /> <br />3. That said petition was signed by all of the voters <br /> <br />of the lands to be annexed as said term is defined in Section <br /> <br />222 of Ordinance No. 1128. <br /> <br />4. That pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 15 of <br /> <br />Ordinance No. 1128, this Council did adopt Resolution No. 6389 <br /> <br />fixing Monday, the 12th day of October, 1970, at the hour of <br /> <br />7:30 o'clock P.M., in the Board of Supervisors Chambers, Hall <br /> <br />of Justice and Records, 401 Marshall Street, Redwood City, <br /> <br />California, as the time and place where the matter of annexing <br /> <br />the hereinafter described lands to General Improvement District <br />No. 1~64 of the City of Redwood City would be considered and <br />all objections thereto would be heard. <br /> ".: <br /> 5. It is hereby found that the city Clerk did publish, <br /> <br />post and mail copies of Resolution No. 6389 as required by <br /> <br />Resolution No. 6389 and Section 1506 of Ordinance No. 1128. <br /> <br />r- 1 <br />