Laserfiche WebLink
ATTY/RESO.0108/PC RESO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DTPP 1330 ECR <br />REV: 01-11-23 JB <br />Page 1 of 23 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 22-13 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF <br />REDWOOD CITY RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL <br />APPROVE A DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN (DTPP) AMENDMENT, A <br />DOWNTOWN PLANNED COMMUNITY PERMIT, A TENTATIVE PARCEL <br />MAP, AND A STATE DENSITY BONUS LAW CONCESSION AND <br />WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND AFFORDABLE <br />HOUSING PLAN FOR THE PROJECT LOCATED AT 1330 EL CAMINO <br />REAL AND DETERMINE THAT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR THE <br />PROJECT HAS BEEN COMPLETED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15168 <br />AND 15183 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIROMENTAL QUALITY ACT <br />(CEQA) GUIDELINES <br /> <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the applicant, Toby Long Design, submitted an application for a <br />Downtown Precise Plan (DTPP) Amendment, a Downtown Planned Community permit <br />(“DPC”) including seven guideline deviations, a Tentative Parcel Map, State Density <br />Bonus Law concession and waiver, and Affordable Housing Plan for a 6-story multifamily <br />residential project consisting of 130 units (including 13 moderate, 6 low income, and 7 <br />very-low income affordable units), located at 1320 El Camino Real, 1322 El Camino Real, <br />1326 El Camino Real, 1330 El Camino Real, and 114 Madison Avenue, (the “Project”) <br />which is located within the DTPP area; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the requested State Density Bonus Law concession would allow the <br />Project to construct 6 stories and 64 feet of building height; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the requested State Density Bonus Law waiver of development <br />standards would allow the Project to implement a 40 degree daylight plane; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on June 11, 2020, the Historic Resources Advisory Committee <br />(“HRAC”) conducted a public hearing to consider the historic evaluation and the peer <br />review for 1322 El Camino Real, and provide an assessment on whether the property <br />qualifies or doesn’t qualify as an individual historic resource based on the findings in these <br />reports. The HRAC concurred with the peer review memo provided by Stantec stating <br />that the property is not individually eligible for the California Register of Historic <br />Resources or Redwood City local landmark designation; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on September 15, 2022, the Architectural Advisory Committee <br />(“AAC”) conducted a public hearing to consider the seven (7) proposed deviations from <br />the DTPP guidelines, including bundled parking, planters being considered a plinth, <br />greater than 25% or 25’ of Madison Avenue building base be inactive, stoops be less than <br />4 feet above sidewalk grade, secondary colors that are brighter be included, the omission <br />of hipped and gabled roofs and the primary roof be accepted as flat roof with parapets, <br />and fixed and casement windows be allowed instead of only single or double hung <br />windows. The AAC supported all 7 deviations. The AAC forwarded its recommendation