Laserfiche WebLink
ATTY/RESO.0084/PC RESO 636 TEREDO DRIVE <br />REV: 08-07-23 JB <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 23-19 <br /> <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF <br />REDWOOD CITY APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL PERMIT NO. <br />AP2022-062 FOR THE PROJECT LOCATED AT 636 TEREDO DRIVE <br />SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND IN ACCORDANCE <br />WITH ARTICLES 45 AND 48 OF THE REDWOOD CITY ZONING CODE <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the applicant, Golden View Renovation (the “Applicant”), filed an <br />application for an Architectural Permit for the demolition of an existing single-story <br />dwelling unit to construct a new two-story single-family dwelling unit which exceeds <br />3,000 square feet and 0.45 floor area ratio (the “Project”) at 636 Teredo Drive (the <br />“Property”); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, under Article 45 of the Redwood City Zoning Code an Architectural <br />Permit is required for new construction, additions or exterior modifications to the second <br />floor or any upper floors; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, under Article 48 of the Redwood City Zoning Code, a public hearing <br />before the Planning Commission (“PC”) is required for review of the Project for <br />conformance with the findings in Sections 45.4 and 48.4; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on August 4, 2023, ten days before to the hearing date, notice of the <br />Planning Commission hearing was mailed to owners and tenants within 300 feet of the <br />Property, placed in the San Mateo Daily Journal and posted on the City’s website; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on August 15, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed <br />public hearing, in accordance with all applicable requirements of State Law, to review <br />Architectural Permit application No. AP2022-062 and supporting materials. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated <br />herein by these references as if fully set forth in their entirety. <br /> <br />Section 2. The Planning Commission, having independently heard, considered, <br />and weighed all the evidence in the record, finds that the above recitals are accurate <br />and constitute findings in this matter and, together with the staff report and the <br />application materials, including without limitation the CEQA determination, development <br />plans, and all other documents, reports, studies, memoranda, maps, oral and written <br />testimony, and materials in the City’s file for the applications and the Project, and all <br />adopted City planning documents relating to the Project and the property including the <br />City’s General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Municipal Code, other applicable City laws and <br />regulations, have together served as an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for