My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2025.02.10 Speaker Card - PC
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Speaker Cards - Public Comments
>
2025.02.10 Speaker Card - PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2025 10:25:36 AM
Creation date
2/11/2025 10:25:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Speaker Card
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/10/2025
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
REDWOOD_CITY\NANCYRAMIREZ
Created:
2/11/2025 10:25 AM
Modified:
2/11/2025 10:25 AM
Text:
mailto:cscivil@me.com
ID:
2
Creator:
REDWOOD_CITY\NANCYRAMIREZ
Created:
2/11/2025 10:25 AM
Modified:
2/11/2025 10:25 AM
Text:
mailto:publiccomment@redwoodcity.org
ID:
3
Creator:
REDWOOD_CITY\NANCYRAMIREZ
Created:
2/11/2025 10:25 AM
Modified:
2/11/2025 10:25 AM
Text:
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From:Christopher Civil <br />To:publiccomment <br />Subject:Support of Amending Redwood City Municipal Code Chapter 15 (Smoking Regulations) <br />Date:Saturday, February 8, 2025 1:22:04 PM <br />[You don't often get email from cscivil@me.com. Learn why this is important at <br />https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] <br />Hello, <br />I write to provide public comment in support of Agenda Item 6J, amending Redwood City Municipal Code Chapter <br />15 (Smoking Regulations). I am resident of Redwood City and live in District 1, which includes the only relevant <br />pedestrian mall currently in operation within Redwood City. I support efforts to eliminate smoking in all forms in <br />public places, including this amendment. While I do not think it goes far enough—contrary to some comments I <br />think there should in fact be better, stronger plans for enforcement and it seems all but assured the existing exempt <br />businesses will somehow find a way to continue to operate when the delayed enforcement ends which somewhat <br />curiously defeats the purpose—it is better than nothing. <br />I support the amendment and hope that it passes. <br />Sincerely, <br />Chris Civil
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.