Reso PC20-01 0008 PC Reso Upholding Appeal - Winter King & Revising Planning Manager's Decision

Browse Search

RESOLUTION NO. 20-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY UPHOLDING THE APPEAL BY WINTER KING AND REVERSING THE PLANNING MANAGER'S DECISION TO GRANT CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. LL2018-010 REGARDING UNADDRESSED PROPERTY LOCATED ON LAUREL WAY (APN: 057-301-390) WHEREAS, David Hammitt (Applicant) applied for a Certificate of Compliance (LL2018-010) to determine if the subject 7,984 square foot property (APN No. 057-301-390) (the Property) is a legal lot (the Project); and WHEREAS, the Planning Manager of the City of Redwood City is empowered to the grant Certificates of Compliance under the Subdivision Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 30, Article 13); and WHEREAS, on November 12, 2019, the Planning Manager issued a Conditional Certificate of Compliance (LL2018-010), determining that the property is a legal lot and providing documents to record the Certificate of Compliance with San Mateo County; and WHEREAS, on November 22, 2019, an appeal of the Planning Manager's decision to issue a Conditional Certificate of Compliance was filed with the City Clerk by Winter King of Shute, Mihaly, & Weinberger LLP; and WHEREAS, on February 7, 2020, a public hearing notice was published in the San Mateo Daily Journal and mailed to interested parties and all property owners within 300 feet of the Property; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Redwood City (Planning Commission) held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the appeal in accordance with all applicable requirements of the State Planning and Zoning Law, and the Redwood City Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth in their entirety. Section 2. The Planning Commission finds that the above recitals are accurate and constitute findings in this matter, and with the staff reports, the application materials, and all other documents, reports, oral and written testimony, and materials in the City's file for the application and the Project, and all adopted City planning documents relating to the Project and the Property including the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, Subdivision Map Act, and other applicable City laws and regulations, have together served as an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution. ATTY/RESO.0008/PC RESO UPHOLDING APPEAL — WINTER KING & REVISING PLANNING MANAGER'S DECISION REV: 02-14-2020 PR Page 1 of 2