Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br /> <br />Currently the 2018-2022 consolidated plan is being worked on. A consolidated plan is required every 5 <br />years to receive federal funds. It outlines and prioritizes needs of the community and states the plans <br />and goals for the next 5 years. Housing and population information is gathered. The needs of the <br />general, senior and disabled population is researched. Community meetings are held to discuss the <br />needs and develop strategies to meet desired goals. Because there is a limited amount of money <br />received from HUD, the focus is on housing and community development. Sources of funds are the <br />Community Development Block Grant and the Home Investment Partnership program. The CDBG funds <br />provide social services, public facilities, home repairs, housing and homeless services and economical <br />development to low and moderate income people. The Home program creates to preserves affordable <br />housing, build new housing and repair existing housing for low and moderate income households. <br />$678,000 were received last year in CDBG funds. The Home funds were $213,000. The funds this <br />coming cycle are less from each source. Though a further drop in funding is estimated for 2018 and <br />possible elimination of the programs, the planning process must continue to access community needs <br />for upcoming programs. Some of the CDBG housing projects funded this year include four housing <br />services, Project Sentinel, housing accessibility modifications by CID, Rebuilding Together’s 2 programs - <br />National Rebuilding Day and Safe at Home Repairs and a CORA safe house rehab. The City also has their <br />Home Improvement Loan program which provides low interest loans to low income homeowners in <br />Redwood City. Funding was also provided to Habitat for Humanity for acquisition of the 603 Jefferson <br />site. Public services programs funded by CDBG this year include HIP Housing, legal services, ombudsman <br />services, Spring St. shelter, CORA, and Life Moves for the Maple St. Shelter. The Housing and Human <br />Concerns Committee determines how the funds will be allotted to the various non-profit organizations <br />that apply for them. The compound process helps by getting feedback from the community. They <br />develop and determine the programs to be funded based on population and neighborhoods’ <br />concentration as to where the funds should go. Cindy handed out surveys for the Commissioners to <br />complete. She also stated that more information is available on the City’s website. <br /> <br />ITEM 4 – Senior Downtown Shuttle – Jodi Paley <br />Vice Chair Paley reviewed the history of shuttle service in Redwood City from 2004, when she was <br />previously on the SAC, to now. In 2004, she compiled a list of local office shuttles in hopes they could be <br />used during the day. In 2005, a stakeholders group was formed. It was chaired by Diane Howard and <br />consisted of representatives from SamTrans, county transportation, the City Manager’s office, Fair Oaks, <br />Parks & Recreation, the school district and seniors. It was a large group that met regularly and reviewed <br />many different ideas and possibilities. In June 2008, an on demand shuttle service began in Redwood <br />City. The Lifeline funding was obtained from the San Mateo County Transportation Agency. The main <br />focus was on the east side of town and covering the Fair Oaks neighborhood. Lifeline funding required <br />service to lower socio-economic areas. It also included stops at the Veterans Memorial Senior Center <br />and Woodside Plaza. It was a free shuttle to any Redwood City location. Individuals would call the <br />driver directly to book a ride the day before it was needed. The driver was bilingual, spoke English and <br />Spanish. Extensive outreach was done promoting it to the community with open houses and meeting <br />the driver. The shuttle ran for at least 2-3 years, possibly 5, until the funding ran out. It was never very <br />well received. It was on demand. It didn’t follow a specific route. People made arrangements directly <br />with the driver. It was free. It still wasn’t used by very many people and was discontinued. Afterwards, <br />the City purchased electric vans, one is in use at the VMSC, bringing seniors to and from the center 3 <br />days a week.