Laserfiche WebLink
7.2.D. - Page 3 <br /> lots. The total project length is approximately 800 I.f.; the frontage of the two subject <br /> lots is approximately 165 I.f. The owner's share of the construction costs would be <br /> $74,000. The owner must pay for their costs prior to building permit issuance. The <br /> agreement also requires that the improvements be placed in the City's Capital <br /> Improvement Program within 1 year of the applicant fulfilling their engineering design <br /> obligation, and constructed within five years thereafter. It is estimated that the <br /> improvements would therefore be completed within the next 2 -7 years. <br /> The agreement provides an option whereby the owner may engage the services of an <br /> engineering firm to design the project. If the owner chooses this option, and the design <br /> and construction documents are accepted and approved by the City Engineer, the <br /> Applicant would only be required to pay $74,000 for proportional construction costs. If <br /> the applicant chooses this option, the design must be approved by the City Engineer <br /> prior to occupancy of the homes. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> 1. Decline the Improvement Agreement and make a determination that the first <br /> property owner within the annexation area to seek development entitlements will <br /> be responsible for the sidewalk and right -of -way improvements along one half of <br /> Alameda de las Pulgas, between Harding Avenue and the Hetch Hetchy. <br /> 2. Decline the Improvement Agreement and direct staff to place the entire Alameda <br /> Sidewalk and Right of Way Improvements project on the City's Capital <br /> Improvements Program. <br /> 3. Direct staff to return with additional options. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> CIP funds may be required, depending on Council direction /action. <br /> Staff recommendation would require $283,000 of City CIP funds to complete the <br /> balance of the improvements. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> Prior annexation of the property was categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15319, <br /> Class 19, and prior subdivision of the property was categorically exempt pursuant to <br /> Section 15315, Class 15 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). <br /> Nor further environmental review is required. <br /> KAREN VAUGHN <br /> SENIOR PLANNER <br />