Laserfiche WebLink
B PCompatibilitlFactorsf EvaluatedtinnALUCPst <br /> 9.A. - Page 137 <br /> about proposed construction that could affect navigable airspace. The standards by which the <br /> FAA conducts these aeronautical studies are set forth in FAR Part 77. Specifically,FAR Part 77 <br /> establishes standards for: <br /> • FAA Notification.Notifying the FAA about any proposed construction or alteration of <br /> objects—whether permanent,temporary, or of natural growth—that could be a hazard to <br /> flight; <br /> • Imaginary Surfaces. Defining an airport's airspace,referred to as `imaginary surfaces'; and <br /> • Aeronautical Studies. Determining obstructions to navigable airspace and the potential <br /> hazardous effects of such obstructions on the safe and efficient use of that airspace. <br /> The FAA's authority to protect the navigable airspace from obstructions and other hazards, <br /> including existing and proposed structures, is predominantly derived from Title 49 U.S.C. <br /> Section 44718. However, Section 44718 does not provide specific authority for the FAA to <br /> regulate or control of off-airport real property.Nevertheless,the FAA does have authority to <br /> require that sponsors of new objects that could be airspace obstructions submit notice to the <br /> agency prior to the construction as outlined below. Persons failing to comply with the provisions <br /> of FAR Part 77 are subject to civil penalty under Section 902 of the Federal Aviation Act of <br /> 1958, as amended and pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 46301(a). <br /> If new airspace obstructions are created or, as may happen with the growth of trees or other <br /> vegetation, are newly identified, federal action is primarily limited to three possibilities: <br /> • Reduceddnstrumentokpproachd Minimums. For airports with instrument approaches, an <br /> obstruction could necessitate modification to one or more of the approach procedures <br /> (particularly greater visibility and/or cloud ceiling minimums) or even require elimination <br /> of an approach procedure. <br /> • ReduceddRunwayaLength.Airfield changes, such as displacement of a landing threshold, <br /> could be required(especially at airports certificated for commercial air carrier service). <br /> • Reducedd?ederalokid. The owner of an airport could be found in noncompliance with the <br /> conditions agreed to upon receipt of FAA grant assurances, airport development or <br /> property acquisition grant funds and could become ineligible for future grants (or,in <br /> extreme cases,be required to repay part of a previous grant). <br /> Subpart B,Notice of Construction or Alteration, of the regulations requires that the FAA be <br /> notified of any proposed construction or alteration of objects within 20,000 feet of a runway and <br /> having a height that would exceed a 100:1 imaginary surface(1 foot upward per 100 feet <br /> horizontally)beginning at the nearest point of the runway. This requirement applies to runways <br /> more than 3,200 feet in length; for shorter runways,the notification surface has a 50:1 slope and <br /> extends 10,000 feet from the runway; for heliports,the notification surface has a 25:1 slope and <br /> extends 5,000 feet from takeoff and landing area, also referred to as the FATO.Notification is <br /> required with regard to any public-use or military airport and heliport. <br /> Also requiring notification is any proposed object more than 200 feet in height regardless of <br /> proximity to an airport. <br /> SanfCarlosfAirportV B-14 ESAfAirportsfl130753f <br /> ALUCPfWhitefPape/ Junef2014f <br />