CC Min 1995-01-16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

,. . . . u . . .. that it could legally be made part of the agreement. Planning Director Patterson advised that the proposed development roads do not meet City standards and could not be - dedicated to the City. The utilities will have to meet the standards established for Redwood Shores and "the City will not accept any utilities over garbage unless it meets extraordinary standards, and if developed will be brought in by the developer and checked by the City's engineering staff to make sure they could work before they are adopted by the City Council." City Attorney Schricker expressed his concerns about the present language regarding standards and the issue of dedication which might have been inherited from the previous agreement, and suggested that if the Council wanted to be clear about not accepting dedications, then the language in the development agreement should clearly state that. MEMO 1/18/95 Mayor Gasparini stated that the Public Hearing had been held and it was time to direct staff to address certain issues, such as the one Vice Mayor Hartnett requested having to do with the traffic assessment district, and the one Councilman Sanfilipo requested having to do with removing the language relating to acceptance of roadway dedications. MEMO 1/18/95 In response to Council questions, Planning Director Patterson advised that if the Council put conditions into the agreement the developer did not want, the developer did have the right to go back to the original, larger 1985 development agreement. - Councilwoman Steinfeld referred to Mr. Rodriguez's statement that the developer was going to use the most conservative building techniques and she would like to have that reflected in the record. Councilwoman Steinfeld referred to the top of Page 14 referring to anyon-site improvements over or near refuse, and asked that staff change the wording from may to shall be subject to an indemnification agreement; and, in that paragraph include bonding for indemnification with a limited time period as was done in Seaport Center, which was a five year indemnification. MEMO 1/18/95 Councilwoman Steinfeld advised that the City did not know what capacity levels the City had regarding water, sewage, drainage and other issues, and before those rights were granted, staff should provide a complete report on current and future commitments, including statistics on high and low rain level years. MEMO 1/18/95 Councilwoman Steinfeld asked that decision on this matter be delayed until all the information is received. MEMO 1/18/95 - MINUTE BOOK NO. 53 Regular Meeting Minutes Page No. 025 January 16, 1995 Page 16