My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-10-06 Closed and Joint with SA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-10-06 Closed and Joint with SA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2014 9:37:50 AM
Creation date
10/3/2014 9:04:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
10/6/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.3.B. - Page 71 <br /> Summary of ImpactF. <br /> Potentially Less than Significant Less than <br /> Significant With Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> a) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of a community? X <br /> b) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? X <br /> c) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency X <br /> with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general <br /> plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the <br /> purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? <br /> Documentation: <br /> a. & b. The DTPP program EIR (p. 4 -16) concludes that implementation of the DTPP would reinforce, with no <br /> substantial change in, established community -wide land use patterns. The EIR (p. 4 -16) also concludes that the <br /> DTPP land use characteristics, provisions, and development standards would result in beneficial land use effects. <br /> The DTPP has been incorporated into the City's General Plan. The proposed project complies with all applicable <br /> DTPP standards, guidelines, and regulations, and would contribute to the beneficial land use effects in the <br /> Downtown area. <br /> c. The project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of agencies with jurisdiction <br /> over the project (DTPP program EIR pp. 4 -18 through 4 -21). The project complies with all applicable DTPP <br /> standards, guidelines, and regulations (e.g., see "Jefferson and Franklin— Downtown Precise Plan Compliance" <br /> matrix, 7/24/14). As a result, no potentially significant land use or planning impacts are anticipated. <br /> Summary of Impacts <br /> Potentially Less than Significant Less than <br /> Significant With Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> XI. MINERAL, RESOURCES -- Would the psoiec:t <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of X <br /> value to the region and the residents of the State? <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource X <br /> recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use <br /> plan? <br /> Documentation: <br /> a. & b. No significant mineral deposits are identified in the DTPP area (DTPP program EIR p. 18 -4). The project site <br /> does not contain valuable or locally important mineral resources, nor will it consume extraordinary amounts of <br /> mineral resources. Therefore, project implementation would not create an impact on mineral resources. <br /> Summary of Impacts <br /> Potentially Less than Significant Less than <br /> Significant With Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> XII. NOISE — Would the project. • . <br /> a) Expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in X <br /> the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other <br /> agencies? <br /> - <br /> b) Expose persons to or generate excessive ground -borne vibration or ground- X <br /> borne noise levels? <br /> c) Result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the X <br /> project vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br /> d) Result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels X <br /> 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.