My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-10-20 Closed and Special Joint with SA_Revised_10_17_2014
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-10-20 Closed and Special Joint with SA_Revised_10_17_2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2014 2:13:26 PM
Creation date
10/16/2014 4:39:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
10/20/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 57 <br /> Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts <br /> surrounding the City. The Bay Plan recommends that urban development be clustered, so as to maximize <br /> views of the San Francisco Bay and to conserve natural landscape features and maximize shoreline access. <br /> The Appearance, Design and Scenic Views Chapter of the Bay Plan contain several policies pertaining to <br /> visual quality and aesthetic character (see below). The City is required to comply with the Bay Plan, and these <br /> policies will result in a less than significant impact. <br /> Policy 1: To enhance the visual quality of development around the Bay and to take maximum <br /> advantage of the attractive setting it provides, the shore of the Bay should be developed in <br /> accordance with the Public Access Design Guidelines. <br /> Policy 2: All Bayfront development should be designed to enhance the pleasure of the user or viewer <br /> of the Bay. Maximum efforts should be made to provide, enhance, or preserve views of the <br /> Bay and shoreline, especially from public areas, from the Bay itself, and from the opposite <br /> shore. To this end, planning of waterfront development should include participation by <br /> professionals who are knowledgeable of the Commissions' concerns, such as landscape <br /> architects, urban designers, or architects, working in conjunction with engineers and <br /> professionals in other fields. <br /> Policy 4: Structures and facilities that do not take advantage of or visually complement the Bay <br /> should be located and designed so as not to impact visually on the Bay and shoreline. <br /> Policy 8: Shoreline development should be built in clusters, leaving open area around them to permit <br /> more frequent views of the Bay. Developments along the shores of tributary waters should <br /> be Bay - related and should be designed to preserve and enhance views along the waterway, <br /> so as to provide maximum visual contact with the Bay. <br /> Policy 9: "Unnatural" debris should be removed from sloughs, marshes, and mudflats that are <br /> retained as part of the ecological system. Sloughs, marshes, and mudflats should be <br /> restored to their former natural state if they have been despoiled by human activities. <br /> Policy 14: Views of the Bay from vista points and from roads should be maintained by appropriate <br /> arrangements of heights of all development and landscaping between the view areas and <br /> the water. In this regard, particular attention should be given to all waterfront locations, <br /> areas below vista points, and areas along roads that provide good views of the Bay for <br /> travelers, particularly areas below roads coming over ridges and providing a "first view" of <br /> the Bay. <br /> c) Less than Significant Impact. Future housing development could change the on- and off -site visual <br /> character of the area in which it is constructed. Since the City is largely built out, the visual character of the <br /> City is urbanized. Regarding the Opportunity Sites associated with the Housing Element, the change will <br /> generally be from vacant residential and mixed -use as well as underutilized mixed -use to low -, medium -, and <br /> high- density residential and mixed -use development. Future housing development guided by the policies of <br /> the proposed Housing Element will be subject to the policies of the General Plan. The Built Environment <br /> Element, Urban Form and Land Use Section of the General Plan require the implementation of good design <br /> based upon adopted development standards and guidelines. The City aims to protect, maintain, and enhance <br /> residential neighborhoods by ensuring that new development complements and reinforces each <br /> neighborhood's unique characteristics through sensitive infill and transitions in scale from adjacent centers <br /> and corridors. The proposed Housing Element does not include any changes in land use or intensity. <br /> Therefore, the adoption of the Housing Element and future housing and mixed -use constructed pursuant to <br /> 4 City of Redwood City General Plan. The Built Environment Element, Urban Form and Land Use Section. 2010. <br /> 18 Redwood City Housing Element Initial Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.