My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-10-20 Closed and Special Joint with SA_Revised_10_17_2014
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-10-20 Closed and Special Joint with SA_Revised_10_17_2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2014 2:13:26 PM
Creation date
10/16/2014 4:39:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
10/20/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 62 <br /> Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts <br /> 1. The local plan should be consistent with the CAP population and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) <br /> assumptions. This is demonstrated if the population growth over the planning period will not exceed <br /> the values included in the current CAP (Note: because the CAP usually lags behind current regional <br /> population projects, BAAQMD recommends that population estimates should be derived from the <br /> most recent ABAG projections and the rate of increase in vehicle trips can be used in lieu of VMT <br /> where VMT data are not available). <br /> 2. The local plan demonstrates reasonable effort to implement the Transportation Control Measures <br /> (TCMs) included in the CAP that identify cities as implementing agencies. <br /> 3. For local plans to have a less than significant impact with respect to potential toxic air contaminants <br /> and /or odors, buffer zones should be established around existing and proposed land uses that would <br /> emit these air pollutions. <br /> The proposed Housing Element does not propose densities higher than already permitted in the General <br /> Plan; thus, adoption and implementation of the Housing Element will not result in an increase in population <br /> and households over those accounted for in the CAP. The anticipated population and household increases <br /> associated with adopted General Plan policy are within the growth assumptions estimated by ABAG and <br /> therefore will not result in a conflict with or obstruction of the CAP. Based on the consistency analysis <br /> presented above, the proposed project will not conflict with the CAP; no impact will occur. <br /> b) Less than Significant Impact. Because the proposed Housing Element does not authorize any <br /> development project or land- altering activity that will involve construction of new or redeveloped housing or <br /> any other development project, the amendment will not result in any direct emissions that could contribute <br /> to an existing or potential violation of an air quality standard. Adoption and implementation of the Housing <br /> Element will have no effect on rules and procedures governing assessment or control of air pollutant <br /> emissions. <br /> The proposed Housing Element will not directly result in construction of any development or infrastructure; <br /> however, future residential development supported by the policies of the updated Housing Element will <br /> result in short -term criteria pollutant emissions. Short -term criteria pollutant emissions will occur during site <br /> preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and painting activities associated with new <br /> development. Emissions will occur from use of equipment, worker, vendor, and hauling trips, and <br /> disturbance of onsite soils (fugitive dust). Pursuant to CEQA, short -term, construction - related emissions <br /> will be analyzed on a project- specific. Mitigation will be applied, where necessary. Such mitigation typically <br /> includes requirements for use of low -VOC paints, installation of diesel particulate filters on older construction <br /> equipment, and limitations on hauling distances and /or daily trips. <br /> Any future proposed development project will be subject to BAAQMD's rules and regulations. The Redwood <br /> City General Plan Public Safety Element's Air Quality section includes goals and policies that require <br /> analysis of air quality impacts, encourage mixed -use development, pedestrian- oriented design, and transit <br /> use to reduce pollutant emissions. No land use changes or changes in intensity are proposed as part of <br /> the proposed project. With application of BAAQMD rules and the General Plan Air Quality goals and <br /> policies, no new or more significant impacts relative to air quality standards will result from implementation <br /> of the Housing Element update beyond those analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Because the proposed <br /> Housing Element is consistent with the AQMP (see Section 4.3.a) and future development projects pursuant <br /> to the proposed project will be subject to the rules, goals and policies noted above to ensure that daily <br /> criteria pollutant thresholds will not be exceeded, impacts will be less than significant. <br /> c) Less than Significant Impact. BAAQMD has prepared the 2010 CAP to set forth a comprehensive and <br /> integrated program that will lead the Basin into compliance with the federal and state nonattainment criteria <br /> Redwood City Housing Element Initial Study 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.