My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-10-20 Closed and Special Joint with SA_Revised_10_17_2014
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-10-20 Closed and Special Joint with SA_Revised_10_17_2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2014 2:13:26 PM
Creation date
10/16/2014 4:39:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
10/20/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 99 <br /> Section 4: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts <br /> 4.16 - TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC <br /> Would the project: <br /> Potentially Less Than Less Than No <br /> Significant Significant with Significant Impact <br /> Impact Mitigation Impact <br /> Incorporation <br /> a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy <br /> establishing measures of effectiveness for the <br /> performance of the circulation system, taking into <br /> account all modes of transportation including mass <br /> transit and non - motorized travel and relevant ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> components of the circulation system, including but <br /> not limited to intersections, streets, highways and <br /> freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass <br /> transit? <br /> b) Conflict with an applicable congestion <br /> management program, including, but not limited to <br /> level of service standards and travel demand <br /> measures, or other standards established by the <br /> county congestion management agency for <br /> designated roads or highways? <br /> c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including <br /> either an increase in traffic levels or a change in ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> location that results in substantial safety risks? <br /> d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design <br /> feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous <br /> intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm <br /> equipment)? <br /> e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs <br /> regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian <br /> facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance <br /> or safety of such facilities? <br /> a) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Housing Element will not directly result in construction of any <br /> development or infrastructure, but future residential development supported by the policies of the updated <br /> Housing Element can be expected to produce additional traffic. However, since the Housing Element will not <br /> alter any land use designations that will affect the traffic impacts presented in the General Plan EIR, no <br /> additional impacts beyond those analyzed in the General Plan will occur. Therefore, proposed Housing <br /> Element will not result in any impacts that were not addressed in the General Plan EIR. Impacts will be less <br /> than significant. <br /> b) Less than Significant Impact. The Congestion Management Program (CMP) is administered by the <br /> City /County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C /CAG). The CMP prioritizes the use of State <br /> and Federal funding for roadway system improvements. These guidelines are intended to ensure the <br /> 60 Redwood City Housing Element Initial Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.