My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-12-08 Closed and Joint SA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-12-08 Closed and Joint SA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2014 10:36:01 AM
Creation date
12/4/2014 10:27:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
12/8/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9.B. - Page 3 <br /> developments exceeds the MAD limitations. The residential, retail and lodging <br /> categories of development are not nearing the limitations set forth by the MAD <br /> limitations. <br /> The first report to Council pertaining to the 80% threshold occurred on September 22, <br /> 2014 (staff report attached). At this meeting, the Council adopted a reservation process <br /> by resolution allowing developments that have been deemed complete to "hold a place <br /> in line" on the way to an actual entitlement (i.e., building permit). By motion, the Council <br /> also directed staff to study potential adjustments to MAD limitations in order to better <br /> reflect current market conditions. <br /> As directed by the Council, staff has been studying whether the MAD levels can be <br /> adjusted and, if so, what form of environmental review may be required under CEQA to <br /> support such adjustments. The City cannot approve any development in excess of <br /> these approved MAD levels without completing a new, comprehensive environmental <br /> analysis, unless it determines that such excess development would not result in any <br /> new environmental effects that were not analyzed and addressed in the DTPP EIR. <br /> However, the City may be able to rely on the previously-certified DTPP EIR to approve <br /> more than 500,000 sf of office development, if it (a) concurrently reduces the MAD level <br /> in another category (residential, retail, or hotel lodging), and (b) can demonstrate that <br /> the potential environmental effects from the increase in office development are offset by <br /> the avoidance of environmental effects from the reduction in other MAD categories. <br /> Staff has focused first on whether the previously-certified DTPP EIR can be used to <br /> support adjustments to the MAD levels that would better accommodate current market <br /> demands in the various development categories, as reflected in the recent development <br /> applications submitted to the City. <br /> Based on this focus and the preliminary review, staff's recommendation is for the <br /> environmental review to analyze a General Plan and DTPP amendment to allow a <br /> conversion of up to 740 housing units and 85,000 sq. ft. of retail space for office uses. <br /> This could allow for approximately 169,000 square feet of additional office space. <br /> Applicants would need to request that this space be converted to office use. <br /> Additionally, a portion of the converted allocations would be restricted to additions to <br /> existing buildings. Please see the discussion section below for additional details. <br /> The purpose of this meeting is for the Council to consider the scope of the <br /> amendments. Confirmation of the scope will allow staff to complete the environmental <br /> review, and bring forward General Plan and DTPP amendments for Council review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.