Laserfiche WebLink
7.1.C. - Page 2 <br /> cost of services. The fees are based on the value of project construction costs. The <br /> higher the value of the project, the higher the plan check and permit costs. <br /> For plan check services, the City pays the consultants a percentage of the plan check <br /> fees received. The amount is typically 60-75% of that collected fee. These are standard <br /> fee arrangements in the Bay Area for this service. The City keeps the remainder of the <br /> fee in order to cover the costs of administrating the plan check program and other <br /> overhead costs. Building inspection costs are paid for on an hourly basis. <br /> The current agreement with Shums-Coda Associate agreement is in place to the end of <br /> this calendar year 2014. Due to the numerous development projects, and current <br /> vacancies, additional funds are required to continue providing plan check and building <br /> inspections services until that time. It is important to note that several Building Division <br /> positions have recently been filled, and all vacant positions will be filled shortly. This will <br /> reduce the reliance on consultants for building inspection services. <br /> A review of recent invoices that we currently at a deficit of approximately $230,000 (the <br /> amount owned to Shum-Coda), due to the cost of plan check services associated with <br /> large development projects. Therefore, staff is recommending an increase of $400,000 <br /> to the Agreement, for a total Agreement of $1,100,000. The Agreement terminates in <br /> December 2014, and no extension of time is recommended with this amendment. <br /> Rather, the Community Development Department will be issuing a Request for Proposal <br /> (RFP) for Plan Check Services in December. Based on the results of the RFP, staff will <br /> bring forward contracts for City Manager and/or Council consideration. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> The City Council could choose to not add funds to the Agreement, however staff does <br /> not recommend this approach as the City has received approximately $230,000 in <br /> services beyond the scope of the current contract. A second option would be to simply <br /> extend the contract by the amount owed to the consultant ($230,000). However, staff <br /> does not recommend this approach, as the additional funds may be necessary to cover <br /> the costs of several imminent plan checks associated with large development projects. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> Building Permit and Plan Check fees are collected from developers and property <br /> owners to pay for these services. For financial accounting, an appropriation transfer will <br /> be requester to transfer funds from Total Employee Services to Professional Services. <br /> This is necessary due to staff vacancies. A budget amendment may be required during <br /> mid-year budget adjustments, however, to pay for services for the remainder of the <br /> fiscal year. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> Not a project under CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act). <br />