Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Bob Norris said that .he felt that both his statement and hers said about the <br /> same thing . But he said that he thought the Planning Commission didn ' t have <br /> the background material that the Housing Concerns Committee has concerning <br /> housing . <br /> Mary Henderson said that the Committee was trying to get something in as a <br /> recommendation that can be put into a legal document before the General Plan <br /> will be available --namely into the Redwood Shores General Plan . She said <br /> that anything the Committee recommended for that Redwood Shores General Plan <br /> theoretically should -be something it would recommend to the General Plan for <br /> the whole City . <br /> Gene Moriguchi asked what percentage of the population of the whole City is <br /> low/moderate- income . Housing Aide Ransom said. that , by federal guidelines , <br /> low•/moderate -income people comprise about a third of the City . <br /> Ken Schroeter said that the Committee was generating the input to the Housing <br /> Element for the whole City . A piece of that will be accelerated with the <br /> Planning Commission for a segment of the City--Redwood Shores . But this piece <br /> of the Housing Element would fit back into the Housing Element for the C i tr as <br /> a whole . Furthermore , that chunk could be prepared for any part of the City , <br /> he said . The struggle would come in implementation . The Planning Cor_ri ssi on <br /> can ' t guarantee that the whole social complex can follow through , he said . <br /> Fred Soderer pointed out that the City has a General Plan to work with , and <br /> it has a zoning ordinance . Doesn ' t State law require that the two agree , he <br /> asked . Ken Schroeter said that they didn ' t have to agree until the first of <br /> the ?jeer . Mary Henderson said that that v3.r%c..o4%fl in v 1uar.4 been extended 1.1 ;w-v. ._ t <br /> July I . <br /> Ken Schroeter said that assigning a specific number or percentage of ].owj <br /> moderate -income units to new developments might make building new housing <br /> an impossibility in the Shores ; if strictly adhered to . On the other hand , <br /> if the new low/moderate -income units were distributed equally throughout the <br /> City , relatively few might go into the Shores . Nonetheless , the policy would <br /> be the same , he said , to provide for low/moderate -income housing where. possible <br /> and distribute it widely . He suggested that the City might try to see if <br /> private enterprise would subsidize low/moderate-income housing . <br /> . Max Rice pointed out that the conservative figures outlined in the paper <br /> presented by Land for People three week ' s previous had indicated that a little <br /> • more than a third of the City was low/moderate- income , and that those households <br /> were competing for 8 percent of the housing which was "affordable" by thee 1 . <br /> Lou Knowles said that he had heard people argue that their neighborhood was <br /> "mixed ineome" - -a s he felt was proposed by the two statements- -because i t had <br /> housing valued at between $30 , 000 and $100 , 000 . He said that the Housing Concerns <br /> Committee of all City committees had the most housing data available to it , and <br /> consequently that its recommendations should be precise . <br /> Neil Smith of Mobil Oil Estates , Ltd . , said that they agreed that there should <br /> be a broad range of housing types and values in Redwood Shores . Mobil has <br /> suggested :changes in--the General Plan of Redwood Shores with that in leind . Their <br /> suggestion for a small initial low/moderate-income housing project would provide <br /> "an early and significant steps" in that direction , he said . Any such policy <br /> MINUTES HOUSING CONCERNS COMMITThE DECEMBER 13 , 1972 PAGE 3 OF 6 <br /> • <br />