Laserfiche WebLink
Housing Concerns Committee page 2 <br /> of appropriate objectives . . . " and the Norris proposal sug- <br /> gests a " . . . sufficient distribution. . . . " The data is avail - <br /> able , as we pointed out in our previous statement , to put <br /> some flesh on these proposals . <br /> It might be instructive to the Committee members to be <br /> made aware of the recommendations of the consultant firm of <br /> Development Research Associates to the San Mateo County Local <br /> • Agency Formation Commission in regards to the Crocker Land/ <br /> Foremost-McKesson development of San Bruno Mountain. DRA <br /> suggested that LAP O : <br /> . 0 . 5 . Require Annexation Agreement to be Drawn Up by Daly <br /> City and Crocker Land Company : <br /> a. Recognize the Visitation Rancho concept and gen- <br /> eral plan <br /> b . Accept application of PUD ordinance <br /> C . Provide for responsibility of on-site and off- <br /> site capital improvements <br /> d. Agree on provision of low and moderate income <br /> housing (20 percent of total may be a reasonable <br /> objective ) . . . <br /> 6. Require Contract Between Crocker Land Company and <br /> Daly City Housing and Redevelopment Authority <br /> a . Identifying the quani t y and type of low and mod-- <br /> er•ule income housing to be provided in Visitation <br /> Rancho <br /> b . Providing a firm schedule for construction tied <br /> not to years , but to numbers of units built in <br /> Rancho <br /> c . Providing for Authority financing of required <br /> number of units to be developed; this may be done <br /> through commitments of <br /> 1 . U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development <br /> 2. City of Daly City <br /> 3. Crocker Land Company <br /> 40 Private financing. . . . <br /> These requirements , DRA suggests , must be met by the city <br /> and the developer before LAFCO will assign permanent snhoreS <br /> of influence and thereby allows the development to proceed <br /> under a city ' s s jurisdiction. While there may be some ques- <br /> tion of the legality of LAFCO ' s requiring very specific com- <br /> mitments on the part of a developer to provide a certain per- <br /> centage of low and moderate income housing before sphere of <br /> influence decisions are finalized, there certainly is no dues-- <br /> A` <br /> • <br />