Laserfiche WebLink
procedures and remedies for the enforcement of the State Housing Law, tt is <br /> currently "under submission" with no action on it expected this year . <br /> The Manager recommended that the San Mateo County HRC (or a Redwood City <br /> Consumer Affairs ) function could be developed to handle complaints regarding <br /> eviction, changes in rent , non-return of rental deposit , etc . , but that this <br /> should be considered a long-range program . He suggested that intensive publicity <br /> given to fair housing surveys , legal research, litigation , and the like "will <br /> give owners and managers who are discriminating second thoughts . " He suggested <br /> that MCFH could play "an important role as an intercity broker of information , " <br /> eliminating redundant research . MCFH could provide a summary of Federal and <br /> State laws on fair housing, including information on bills currently before <br /> Congress or the State Legislature , as well as a summary of the fair housing <br /> programs and legal activities of other cities . <br /> Concerning the overturning of the Rumford Act pre-emption of local fair housing <br /> legislation , Manager Fales said that perhaps the HCC would like to recommend to <br /> the City Council that it get together with other Peninsula cities to "author our <br /> own bill" to be put in the legislative hopper in Sacramento by one of our local <br /> legislators . <br /> He said that his office was involved in researching the whole area of consumer <br /> affairs , with inquiries out to a number of counties , among them Los Angeles , <br /> Sacramento, and Santa Clara, and that Redwood City was requesting that the <br /> League of Cities investigate the possible role of cities in consumer affairs , <br /> particularly in housing . <br /> DISCUSSION OF RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> • <br /> Gene Moriguchi commented that , in his experience , the County HRC refers fair <br /> housing complaints to the Fair Employment Practices Commission , which takes <br /> ninety days to get to the case , by which time the interviewers they sent out <br /> find everything "has been covered up . " This is the procedure followed under <br /> the Rumford Act , he said , but under the Unruh Civil Rights Act an immediate <br /> suit can be brought . <br /> Gene Gutierrez , summer intern in the Manager ' s office , said that the most direct <br /> method was to get some kind of injunction against an apartment owner, but that <br /> that cost $300 a shot for a lawyer . It would put an economic incentive on the <br /> apartment owner to do something, he said , but the funding was a problem. <br /> Gene Moriguchi said that the FEPC process was mainly investigative and that <br /> it was long and arduous . Even in fields of discrimination in employment, he <br /> said, lawyers have found it easier to go to court under the 1968 Civil Rights <br /> act directly with a civil damage suit . <br /> Gene Gutierrez said that the HRC does still confront apartment owners and that <br /> the worst they can do is to "intimidate the guy . " They have no legal bite , he <br /> said . Gene Moriguchi said that the HRC meets the owner or manager on a one-to- <br /> one basis , in which the manager simply asserts that he hasn ' t discriminated . <br /> Gene Gutierrez said that the HRC could take specifics and confront the apartment <br /> owner with them and that ' s what HRC staff said they would do . <br /> MINUTES HOUSING CONCERNS COMMITTEE JULY 12 , 1972 PAGE 4 OF 5 <br />