HHC MIN 1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Chairman Keckl.ey said that he was sure the Committee understood that the meeting method wasn ' t going to be a hundred percent effective , but that if the Committee got cooperation from fifty or sixty percent of the owners at fault , that would be an improvement . Be suggested the Committee go ahead with the ' meetings . Bob Norris moved that the HCC desired individual conferences with the 53 apart- ment owners , that the staff consider the Menlo Park and Palo Alto model for the conferences , and that the owners who elect not to show up be turned over to the HRC . Fred Soderer seconded the motion . It carried without opposition , Mel Kerwin abstaining . Housing Aide Ransom introduced Cliff Baxley , director of the 0E0 Probe Center in Redwood City , to bring the Committee up to date concerning the San Mateo County Housing Authority . Ransom reminded the Committee that the Housing Authority manages some hundred- odd units in Redwood City , but that as much as twenty percent of the City ' s households qualify for the program and could be housed under the Housing Authority program if it were sufficiently funded and competently managed . Cliff Boxley said that when he came to Probe a..n 1968 the Housing Authority had just begun its program under Section 23 of the federal housing law, and he had been able to place a number of people in Housing Authority units . But when the units were all filled , there were still people in need of housing, and he and others had begun to look into the Housing Authority to see why there weren 't more units . The had found that the Authority ' s Board of Commissioners met late in the afternoon in "lily-white Burlingame , " he said , but popular pressure had forced them to meet at night and listen to complaints . He and others had found that the commissioners and the executive director didn ' t really want the Section 23 units , and that HUD ' s allocation of 600 additional units had been slowed by the Housing Authorityts unwillingness to accept a standard lease . Most of those who presently sit on the Commission had already been appointed then , he said . Since then, he said , the Housing Authority has been under continuous fire , with complaints ranging from individual tenants protesting unwarranted evictions to the Housing Authority ' s own staff protesting that the executive director allows it no part in making decisions . At one time , the Board of Commissioners were forced to set up a Tenants Advisory Council, but it died on the vine because they weren ' t serious about it . Last fall , HUD officials were in attendance when people from all over the County protested a Housing Authority attempt to drop 52 tenants from its rolls because the Authority was over its allocation . At about the same time , HUD wrote the Housing Authority that it could allocate no additional units because of the Authority ' s late fiscal reporting and an unusually high staff turnover . HUD followed with a financial audit and a management review, which basically documents the complaints made by groups and individuals since 1968 . In its cover letter to the management review, HUD makes it clear that no more units will be allocated until the Authority ' s deficiencies are corrected . MINUTES HOUSING CONCERNS COIvllviITTEE JULY 26 , 1972 PAGE 3 OF 5