My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
HHC MIN 1972
RedwoodCity
>
Civic Cultural Commisson
>
HHC Minutes
>
HHC MIN 1972
>
HHC MIN 1972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2014 1:33:11 PM
Creation date
12/4/2014 1:06:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
1/1/1972
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f h <br /> • <br /> Jim Pales said that he felt the City ' s response ought to be to the Redwood Shores <br /> area. ,, not a particular landowner , whether it is Mobil or ABC or whoever . The <br /> City should have a policy th-s.t sticks and is going to be one that could apply <br /> to anybody . Concerning the density ty bonus idea. , he said , it was easier to see <br /> how that would work in a newly developing area :1.i1>e Redwood Shores . But how <br /> would it wort, on an individual site basis in other parts of the City? And <br /> would allowing nigher densities inherently limit the other things that, make the <br /> quality of 1:i. fe high, C1eati_11( a situation where :Low/moderate- income families <br /> would not get amenities ? <br /> Lou Knowles suggested that perhaps the question was whether or not the basic <br /> zoning is a:1.ready too high . <br /> • <br /> Kent Sebrobter.• w;trned against the illusion that Redwood Shores is the '`frontier " of . <br /> new housing in Redwood City . More housing is developed on the other side of the <br /> Bayshore than in Redwood Shores , he said , both now and replacement housing . <br /> Eileen Gray said that she thought Lou Knowles was saying that the HCC should <br /> approach developers in a firm manner about getting low/moderate - income housing <br /> and that his proposes) s are just one way to do so . . . . . <br /> Mary Henderson asked where the County housing element had got to . Dave Ransom <br /> said that he had called , the Board of. Supervisors and found that it had not yet <br /> made its way onto their agenda. . . Kathy Mahaney said that she was concerned at its <br /> getting lost and asked what could be done . Mary Henderson said she would make <br /> inquiries with some of the supervisors and the new planning director . She <br /> suggested that he be invited to an upcoming HCC meeting . <br /> Mary Henderson thanked Lou Knowles for coming in with his "thoughtful proposal" <br /> timed at "just the right moment . " <br /> She requested that staff make a summary of the meeting with the apartment owners <br /> at the next HCC meeting . She suggested that the news announcing the next meeting <br /> inform those absent that this meeting had lacked a quorum . <br /> The study session adjourned . at 8 : 20 A .M. <br /> The next meeting of the Housing Concerns Committee will be September 13 , 1972 . <br /> • <br /> • <br /> MINUTES HOUSING CONCERNS COMMITTEE AUGUST 22 , 1972 . PAGE 5 OF 5 <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.