Agmt04 Bayside Gardens - Water - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

II , . , - II ì ì Prioritv 1 Customers: 8 existing First Step Project customen¡ (dedicated landsCape Irrisatlon meters) I . Customers with agreements In place for serviœ I . Potential customers or groups of customers that have. rela6ve,lylarge irrigation or industrfaldemands, and are adjacent to pot&ntialltansmission pipelÎneoorridors I Priorftv 2 Customers: . potentlâl customers or groups of customers that have small to medium-sized demands, I and are adjacent to or relatively near potential transmission pipeline corridors Pliorftv 3 CUstomers: . . Potenti¡¡ cus.lPmers or gtol,Jp$ of customers with relatively smell demands. that are either remote from potentia! transmfssionp!þeline corridors, or may have higher customer site retrom costs I . Proposed future developmen1s or r&-development slles; or eXisting customer sites that are served by priVate wells or the Callfomia Water Service Company I Prion1v 4 Customers: . Landscaped sites that are not presentiy irrigated o-rother uses that have very low I demands . SItes that are very remote from potentialltansm~ion pipetine conidors, reqtdre ¡;ignlflcant edditiol1al pumping because of site elevation, or appear to have very I challenging/expensive customer site retrofit costs Priority 1 and. 2 customers represent the most viable customers that are ready 10 be served, if I the Cuy implements a mandalory use ordinance or obtains individual &g!'Ell:lments for service. The annual recycled waw demand from Pricrfty 1 and 2 customers I'eÞresønts the most reMOnable minimum estimate of potential "new water supplY" for I~rated w¡lter supply I planning. some portilJn of P rlori!y 3 customer demands lippe.vabIe to be cost-effectIvely served, however, service In many cases IS dependent upoo establlshinglnslitulional agreements to replace a current water supplier or futt.lre devekìpment or redave/oprnent I actMties. Priority 4 customers do net aPPe$" Viable for a number of l'Î!asons. Althoughlhey wera considered inìtially, Ihelrdèmal'lds do no! appear to be a søurce of 'new water supplY" for the City. I The potential recycied waterdamand for Priority 1,2, and3customEll'S In Radwood City ap pears to rangebetweeoabo~ 1,100 and 3, 172acrl! faetper year (AF /yr), for a Radwood Shores only project and a City-wide project, respectively. Within theseprojectJons. about 582 I AF/yr Is for future developments or redewtopment projects thatara in various s1ages of planning. I . Wetør Recycflng Feælbt1Jty SItIrlY for RedwOod CIty v