Agmt15 Clean Lakes, Inc. - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1. Copies of Pest Control Advisor (PCA) recommendations prepared for the application of cepper; 2. Detailed maps of the RCPW treatment and discharge area(s) that clearly show locations of applications that have occurred or are anticipated to occur. If possible, m�ps are to be provided electronically in ArcView,AutoCAD, or Adobe file formats; 3. Maps of known problem areas for algae that will be targeted by applications; 4. Data on the type and location of known or suspected endangered, threatened, or listed species; 5. I�abitat or water yuality rel�ted interactions with regulatory agencies such as Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR), County Agricultural Commissioner (CAC), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), US Army Corps of Engineers ECOE), California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), or other local, state, and federal agencies; 6. In�ormation on the status and activity of any group(s) that may oppose the use of copper or have been adverse to the RCPW on related issues. Task 3: CEQA Document Preparation: Based on the results of Tasks 1 and 2, CLI's Team will prepare a CEQA Initial Study (IS) that includes significant focus on water quality and biological resources with the intention of identifying the water quality and/or biological environm�ntal impacts of the project and determine wh�th�r the identified impacts are "significant". The project is defined as the RCPW's use of copper to control algae and other aquattic veget�tion in its conv�yances. Based on findings of"significance", CLI's Team will prepare one of the following documents: • Negative Declaration if there are no "significant" impacts; or • Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) if there are potentially "significant" impacts that can be avoided or mitigated If ane or more potentially significant impacts are identified, CLI's Team would intend to establish a course of mitigation based on one or more of the following: 1. The EPA registration process resulting in the product label; 2. T�e CDPR registration process resdlting in a California label; 3. The pCA written recommendation; 4. The application done or supervised by a QAL/QAC; 5. The existence of monitoring ar�d reporting as required by the permit: 6. The existence of the SIP exceptibn to the CTR Priority Pollutant values for copper; 7. Curre�t mitigation employed by the RCPW's, including, but not limited to implementation of Integrated Pest Management(IPM); and 8. Avail�bie water quality data that demonstrates no apparent adverse impacts from the use of copper. T�sk 4: Publi�ation, Notification �tlt� �'iling: Working with �CPW staff, CLI's Team will assist it� the preparation and circulation of a public Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a Negative Declaration, or a Mitigated Negative Declaration. This will include the following sub-tasks: ATTY/AGR.2015.015/CLEAN LAKES lNC. REV:01-27-15 MLG Page il of 14