Agmt15 Clean Lakes, Inc. - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• Post an NOI with the County Clerk,individuals and locations identified by RCPW; • Provide an NOI and a Notice of Completion (NOC) to the State Clearing House, responsible trustee, and other agencies identified by RCPW; • Consult with up to three(3)responsible and trustee agencies identified by RCPW; • If there are proposed changes to any mitigation measures, attend a public hearing; • File a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the County Clerk and the State Office of Planning and Research. Task 5: Prepara�ion of SIP Ezception and Submission to the SWRCB: CLPs Team will prepare the required SIP Exception documents according to the "Procedures for Case-by-Case Exceptions from SIP Provisions" published by the SWRCB. Once completed, Consultant will deliver the SIP exception request documentation package to appropriate SWRCB staff. Task 6: Attend SWRCB Worlcshop and Meeting: On the behalf of the RCPW, CLPs Team wil� attend one (1) SWRCB meeting to ar�swer any questions peRaining to the SIP exception request and CEQA documentation. Task 7: Revise the Notice of Intent (NOI): CLI's Team will complete the Notice of Intent (NOI) and submit it to the SWRCB on RCPW's behalf. For flexibility, Consultant suggests that the following aquatic herbicides be added to the NOI: • Copper(Ex.Nautique�) • Fluridone(Ex. Sonar ❑) • Imazapyr(Ex. Habitat ❑) • Glyphosate(Ex. Rodeo�r AquaMaster��r similar) • 2,4-D(Ex. Weedar[[�r similar) • Triclopyr(Ex. Renovate�r similar) • Diquat(Ex. Reward T�r or sim • Endothall (Ex. Cascade ❑, TetonOO or Aquathol ❑ • Sodium peroxyhydrate-containing compounds(Ex. GreenClean�or similar) • Imazamox(Ex. Clearcast�) Task 8: Biologist Assessment: Consistent with requirements of the SIP Section 5.3 exception anticipated to be obtained by the RCPW's for the use of copper, a pre- and post-application assessment of the beneftcial uses of receiving waters is required. The above scope af wark asaumes the�ollowing: 1. 1�CpW is the certifying lead agency for the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative � Declaration. 2. Biolagical resource da.ta, historical copper use data if available, water quality data (including hardness), maps, p�st NPDES permit report(s), and other reyuired project background information is made readily available to us. 3. The timeline for the re-opening of the permit by the SWRCB to add RCPW's as a SIP exception holder is unknown. As such, we will work with SWRCB staff to identify the earliest possible date. 4. Because this scope is based on requirements of a permit, uncertainty exists as to the level of effort needed to prepare a scientifically and legally defensible CEQA document. This ATTY/AGR.2015.015/CLEAN LAKES INC. REV:01-27-15 MLG Page 12 of 14