My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC15-01 PC Reso (3051 ) to Adopt Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration - La Palma
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Reso PC15-01 PC Reso (3051 ) to Adopt Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration - La Palma
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 9:44:00 AM
Creation date
2/23/2015 9:34:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
2/3/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3.0 Environmental Impact Checklist <br /> 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br /> a) Have a substantial adverse effect,either <br /> directly or through habitat modifications,on <br /> any species identified as a candidate,sensitive, <br /> or special-status species in local or regional <br /> plans, policies,or regulations,or by the <br /> California Department of Fish and Game or the <br /> U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? –I <br /> b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any <br /> riparian habitat or other sensitive natural <br /> community identified in local or regional plans, ❑ f-1 f�l <br /> policies,or regulations or by the California <br /> Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish <br /> and Wildlife Service? <br /> c) Have a substantial adverse effect on I — <br /> federally protected wetlands as defined by <br /> Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, ❑ f <br /> but not limited to, marsh,vernal pool, coastal, <br /> etc.) through direct removal,filling,hydrological <br /> interruption, or other means? <br /> d) Interfere substantially with the movement of Y <br /> any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife <br /> species or with established native resident or n i ❑ <br /> migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of <br /> native wildlife nursery sites? <br /> e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ® ❑ ❑ <br /> protecting biological resources,such as a tree <br /> C preservation policy or ordinance? I I <br /> f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted I <br /> Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community <br /> Conservation Plan, or other approved local, <br /> regional, or state habitat conservation plan? <br /> a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications,on any <br /> species identified as a candidate, sensitive,or special-status species in local or regional plans, <br /> policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish <br /> and Wildlife Service? <br /> No Impact.The project site is located in an urban setting and has been developed for residential <br /> uses for the past 50 to 60 years.Due to the developed condition of the project site,its urbanized <br /> surroundings, and lack of natural habitats on-site,no special-status plant species or special- <br /> status wildlife species are expected to occur. The project's construction and the long-term <br /> occupancy of the homes would not impact any special-status species. Note that impacts to <br /> migratory birds are addressed under section d),below. <br /> La Palma Subdivision Project <br /> Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br /> 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.