Reso PC15-01 PC Reso (3051 ) to Adopt Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration - La Palma

Browse Search

3.0 Environmental Impact Checklist block on the plan set or by separate signed letter,either of which is approved by the City's Landscape Architect. Mitigation Measure BIO-3:Prior to Grading Permit issuance,the applicant shall be required to submit a Tree Protection Plan incorporating the specific measures included in the project's Tree Survey/Arborist Report to protect the coast live oaks and redwood tree on the project site. The Tree Protection Plan shall include fencing details, fertilization and pruning methods, and buffer work areas during construction.The plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City Landscape Architect.It shall consider the potential impacts and construction practices for all structures, including main buildings and accessory structures such as fences or walls. Loss of any of these trees within 2 years of construction shall be subject to Mitigation Measure BIO-2,which requires full replacement value. At minimum,post-construction, there would be the same amount of trees on-site as before construction of the project. With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-3, impacts related to local policies and ordinances protecting biological resources would be less than significant. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan,or other approved local,regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The project site and surrounding areas are not subject to a Habitat Conservation PIan(HCP) or a Natural Community Conservation Plan. The closest conservation plan to the project site is the San Bruno Mountain HCP, located approximately 12 miles north of the project area. Therefore, the project would not impact or conflict with these plans. 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES EessAnan- 5I r�lfl GnS Signalc 1 I ant LeST•thah- ulct Ih ,• Iowa with Signiticatll Na impact Impact wig alion . frncorpatarie •a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined p ❑ ❑ I ❑ X in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ! i significance of an archaeological resource r ❑ r ❑ ❑ pursuant to Section 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ❑ i ❑ ❑ paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains,including those j interred outside of formal cemeteries? I ❑ I ® I ❑ ❑ La Palma Subdivision Project Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 30