Laserfiche WebLink
3.0 Environmental impact Checklist <br /> Avenue by 2.5 percent southeast of the project site and 1.7 percent northwest of the project site. <br /> The 5 percent threshold, therefore, would not be exceeded by implementation of the project. <br /> Because the project's trip generation is insignificant compared to the existing Woodside Road <br /> traffic volumes, project traffic would not deteriorate the performance of the Woodside <br /> Road/Kentfield Avenue intersection.The project would not conflict with an applicable plan, <br /> ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation <br /> systems and project impacts would be less than significant. <br /> c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an increase in traffic levels or a <br /> change in location that results in substantial safety risks? <br /> No Impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within the vicinity of a <br /> public airport or private airstrip.The San Carlos Airport, the closest airstrip to the project area, <br /> is located approximately 3.5 miles northwest of the project site. Due to the distance from the <br /> most proximate airstrip to the project area, the project would not impact air traffic patterns. <br /> d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous <br /> intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br /> No Impact. The project would not include any changes to local streets or intersections. The <br /> existing three single-family homes on-site have separate driveways that provide access to <br /> Kentfield Avenue. The project would utilize a single new 25-foot-wide driving surface that <br /> would provide access to the residential units from Kentfield Avenue. This access is intended for <br /> residents and their guests and would enhance internal circulation. The project would not <br /> introduce or increase hazards due to a design feature. <br /> e) Result in inadequate emergency access? <br /> Less-than-Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Neither construction nor long- <br /> term occupancy of the homes would require changes to the local street system that would affect <br /> emergency access. Emergency access to the project site would be provided by a private <br /> driveway from Kentfield Avenue. The City's engineering standards for a private street requires <br /> a minimum 25-foot-wide vehicular roadway surface as well as a separate minimum 5-foot-wide <br /> sidewalk on one side of the street. The project would conform to the City's engineering <br /> standard;the project's residential units would be accessed via a new private street comprised of <br /> a 25-foot-wide driving surface,plus a 5-foot-wide edge of enhanced pavement on each side of <br /> the driving surface for pedestrian use. Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 would require a <br /> determination from the City's Fire Marshall that the project's roadways and turning radii <br /> conform to the standards for emergency vehicle access. <br /> Mitigation Measures TRAF-1: Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the applicant <br /> shall submit project plans to the City's Fire Marshall for review to determine that all <br /> roadway surface areas and turning radii conform to standards for emergency vehicle <br /> access.Roadways to be used for emergency vehicle access shall be marked as fire lanes <br /> and marked in accordance with Section 22500.1 of the California Vehicle Code. <br /> Pursuant to the City of Redwood City's approval of the project, the project would be <br /> required to comply with all emergency access standards of the Redwood City Fire <br /> La Palma Subdivision Project <br /> Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br /> 59 <br />